San Jose Mercury News, Calif., Term Sheet Column

May 15–HIGH-SPEED INTERNET CONNECTION CARRIES A STEEP PRICE: Palo Alto’s start-up crowd is a bit perplexed about the city’s policy on fast Internet connections. The city built an undergroundhigh-speed digital fiber loop for businesses to connect to, but it’s prohibitively expensive even for some people right on top of it.

The city is charging start-up Core Mobility $10,000 to dig a three-foot trench across the sidewalk. That’s required to connect a Hamilton Street fiber to Core Mobility’s building, also on Hamilton.

Core Mobility, with 30 employees, is struggling with other bills and doesn’t have the cash. So Chief Executive Konstantin Othmer is relying on a friend, located two blocks away, to beam him 10 megabits of bandwidth from an antenna in direct line-of-sight of Core Mobility’s offices.

The fiber, which runs at 100 megabits, is what every company dreams of. Even Core Mobility’s connection, which drops to 10 megabits because of the relay, is enough for most of the company’s needs. Still, Core is still looking for a way to get access to 100, which Othmer says is required if they are to do the Web hosting they want. “The city is doing 90 percent of the work, but leaving the remaining 10 percent undone,” says Jaggie Ayyangar, Core’s engineering manager.

Palo Alto says its network is run like a business, and that costs do vary, depending on construction and engineering needs. Josh Wallace, a city account manager, is aware that some companies are unhappy: “We’re trying to get there,” he says.

At least Core Mobility has the option. Applied Materials Ventures, a venture firm funded by the public company of the same name, is based on Crane Road in downtown Menlo Park. Partners Julien Nguyen and Fahri Diner are exasperated, they say, because they can’t get access to high-speed fiber even if they pay big money.

Menlo Park just doesn’t offer it. “Our e-mail is so slow, I don’t want to admit to our (portfolio) companies how small our bandwidth is,” says Nguyen. Video conferencing is not an option. Doing some rough math, Nguyen says his DSL connection is 300 times slower than the 10 megabit connection he wants. “I prefer to check e-mails from home,” he moans.

He and Diner propose that the city, which is in charge of building permits, consider requiring real estate developers to supply fiber to new residential homes and business offices. They worry the lack of sufficient broadband connection for many of Silicon Valley’s start-ups threatens the area’s competitive edge and future economic growth. Citing the moves afoot in Taiwan, Korea and China to link up homes to fiber, Nguyen says, “We’re really in danger of falling behind.”

Granted, many of the cities in Taiwan, Korea and China are denser than the Bay Area. More residents and workers per square mile lowers the overall cost of connecting them with fiber.

Audrey Seymour, Menlo Park’s assistant city manager, said she welcomed the proposal, and wants to hear more.

Other Bay Area communities are limping along. Eric Freidenrich, a travel counselor in Woodside, worked for years to get a high-speed line, and only a year ago landed a decent connection through Pac Bell. “You’d think Woodside, the home of Larry Ellison, would be first on the block to get it,” he said. His parents, who live in Atherton, still can’t get a connection, he noted.

The woes haven’t stopped Applied Materials Ventures from doing deals. But they see a new trend afoot: VCs have been so badly burned by the drastic fall in valuations for their companies, they’re preventing their companies from doing second rounds of funding. They’re too painful.

When companies go out to raise a second round (also known as a Series B), the first-round VCs get wiped out because the new VCs — supplying the second round money — insist on terms that lower the ownership stakes of first-round investors. “Series B is the cemetery of venture capital,” said Nguyen. “We call it the Series B massacre.”

Last year, 60 percent of all second rounds were so-called “down-rounds,” where valuations were dropped and existing venture capitalists saw their ownership stakes dwindle. No longer willing to take that risk, Applied Materials and other VCs require a company to raise between $25 and $40 million in their first round, and they’re expected to last on that forever.

That forces start-ups to burn up time on the road, building a syndicate of VCs willing to cough up so much money. Some entrepreneurs say it isn’t worth it. Other entrepreneurs, Applied’s Diner admits, are funding start-ups with their own money.

CONWAY CONTINUED: Turns out that Angel Investors, the struggling venture firm started in 1998 by Ron Conway, and covered last month in Termsheet, came up with another innovation during the boom. Partner Casey McGlynn apparently also retained his job at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati all along, and billed companies that Angel Investors backed for work he did in helping them raise money.

One executive at Olliance said he was surprised when his company received a bill for $300-plus an hour from McGlynn. McGlynn, active again on the investing circuit, didn’t respond to a request for comment. Neither did Wilson Sonsini.

Term Sheet — a name drawn from the formal proposal that a venture capitalist offers to an entrepreneur — is a biweekly column published on Thursday about venture capitalists and the companies they fund. To read this column online, see www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/business/columnists/mattmarshall. Contact Matt Marshall at [email protected] or (415)477-2518.

—–

To see more of the San Jose Mercury News, or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to http://www.mercurynews.com.

(c) 2003, San Jose Mercury News, Calif. Distributed by Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News.

About the HedgeCo News Team

The Hedge Fund News Team stays on top of breaking news in the Hedge Fund industry on an hourly basis. Signup to HedgeCo.Net to recieve Daily or Weekly news updates from our team.
This entry was posted in HedgeCo News. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.

San Jose Mercury News, Calif., Term Sheet Column

May 1–Full disclosure in business is almost always a good thing.

California’s giant pension fund, CalPERS, on Wednesday hammered one of the last nails in the coffin of secrecy in the venture capital industry — and it’s probably a good thing for Silicon Valley.

On Wednesday, it posted the financial performance results of $3 billion of its venture investments on its Web site — including those of many prominent Bay Area venture firms: Bay Partners, Lightspeed Venture Partners, Draper Fisher Jurvetson, Sevin Rosen Funds, MSDW Ventures, Doll Capital Management and Focus Ventures.

The results of these firms are showing big negative signs. All made big money during the Internet boom, and now they’re suffering losses in the down cycle. They’ve also got seven or eight years left in their fund-life to try to salvage something of their investments. In many cases, it’s much too early to judge how they’re doing, and so the number behind the negative sign isn’t very meaningful.

During a legal tussle with the Mercury News last year, CalPERS at first resisted release of the results of the investments, made through its middleman, Grove Street Advisors.

Venture capitalists were worried that the public would misinterpret their results, and pressured CalPERS and Grove Street to keep them private. But early this year, CalPERS about-faced, and decided public employees had a right to know how their retirement funds are doing.

The main thing is that public good has been served. We can now parse all of the data available to us — a firm’s results, the fees made by its managers, the donations the managers made to the political campaigns of CalPERS’ elected officials — and decide whether we think CalPERS’ investments are made fairly — and based on merit alone. More specifics on management fees would be even better.

(To see the performance of CalPERS’ venture investments, go to http://www.calpers.ca.gov/invest/aim/aim.asp. To see the specific Grove Street investments, which are the jewels of CalPERS’ VC investments, click on California Emerging Ventures I, II, III).

E-TRADE’S VENTURE: Among Grove Street’s investments is Arrowpath, a $400 million venture fund based in Menlo Park in which E-Trade invested at least $82 million.

Turns out that two former E-Trade executives, Christos Cotsakos, who was chief executive until last year, and Jerry Gramaglia, who was president, are helping run Arrowpath.

E-Trade lost $186.4 million on revenue of $1.33 billion in 2002, but the two are still doing well for themselves.

Gramaglia has been active with Arrowpath for a year, in a role of “Entrepreneur-in-Residence,” and received a $1.6 million bonus from E-Trade last year, according to the company’s proxy statement. E-Trade did not respond to a call asking why Gramaglia was awarded such a large bonus. Anyway, not a bad income for such lean times.

Cotsakos, meanwhile, received $12.2 million in pay from E-Trade last year, according to the Tuesday proxy filing.

Cotsakos resigned in January from the online brokerage after an outcry over the revelation that he was paid $80 million for 2001. The lucrative pay package became the subject of lawsuits and the controversy prompted Cotsakos to give up a portion of the pay.

Let’s just hope Cotsakos and Gramaglia aren’t expecting such magnanimity from CalPERS’ and Grove Street, who have to negotiate with firm managers about how much in fees to pay them.

So far, things don’t look too bad. CalPERS’ online report, which is current through Sept. 2002, shows Arrowpath drew $825,000 from CalPERS and its investments still worth $723,318. The difference is mostly the fees that went to Arrowpath managers since 2001. That’s a little over $100,000.

Thomas Bevilacqua, an Arrowpath partner, wouldn’t comment on specifics, but he said Arrowpath sold one of its investments, Security Focus, to Symantec at the end of the year — after CalPERS’ report closed. That means Arrowpath’s return is now in positive territory, much better than most of Grove’s Street’s other firms.

So far, so good. The difference is, now at least we can see what’s going on.

–Term Sheet — a name drawn from the formal proposal that a venture capitalist offers to an entrepreneur — is a biweekly column published on Thursday about venture capitalists and the companies they fund. To read this column online, see www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/business/columnists/mattmarshall. Contact Matt Marshall at [email protected] or (415)477-2518.

—–

To see more of the San Jose Mercury News, or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to http://www.mercurynews.com.

(c) 2003, San Jose Mercury News, Calif. Distributed by Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News.

ET,

About the HedgeCo News Team

The Hedge Fund News Team stays on top of breaking news in the Hedge Fund industry on an hourly basis. Signup to HedgeCo.Net to recieve Daily or Weekly news updates from our team.
This entry was posted in HedgeCo News. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.