Jan. 26–Would you take flying lessons from someone who had never been in a plane? How about medical advice from someone who had never seen a patient?
This may seem ridiculous, but you are now receiving advice on stocks from people who have never invested in them.
In their desire to avoid conflicts of interest, most Wall Street firms are banning analysts from owning stocks of companies they follow. This is the wrong solution to the excesses of the last bubble.
Do you think Henry Blodgett had his life savings in Amazon at $400 a share, or that energy analysts all owned Enron at $80? The bubble wasn’t caused by analysts touting stocks they owned. It was caused by analysts touting stocks they didn’t own.
Now, with more restrictions, the problem is getting worse. Wall Street is breeding a generation of analysts who will never own a stock.
When a stock they recommend goes up, they bask in its glory and raise their price target. They don’t care if it is overpriced. They don’t own it.
When a company reports bad news, they rush to downgrade it.
This is of no use to investors who must decide what to do when it opens down $10.
To make matter worse, the litigation in the U.S. has emboldened the fighting French to punish analysts.
Recently, a French court fined Morgan Stanley, because one of its analysts said something negative about Louis Vuitton. Morgan Stanley promptly retaliated by saying it just won’t follow the company any longer.
With the threat of lawsuits and no equity interest, analysts and their bosses will be more cautious about stating critical opinions.
Many business periodicals as well as CNBC are banning their reporters from owning stocks. This, too, is a mistake. I’m not worried that a reporter on CNBC owns 1,000 shares of Citigroup. These holdings can be divulged to viewers. But I want the people who give me the news to understand the process of investing.
I run an investment fund. The advice I give you is based on what I’m buying and selling. My rules to avoid conflicts are simple. I won’t front-run this column by buying a stock shortly before I recommend it. I only recommend stocks I intend to own for months, and won’t sell one I’ve recommended for at least two weeks, unless there is some extraordinary intervening event.
Wall Street would work better if brokers forced their analysts to invest their bonuses in a market basket of stocks they follow and then divulged those positions to all their customers. The same is true for market commentators.
Investing isn’t an intellectual exercise. I want to take my advice from people who have their own skin in the game. Next week, I will give you my picks for 2004.
Peter Siris ([email protected]) is a New York hedge fund manager.
—–
To see more of the Daily News, or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to http://www.NYDailyNews.com
(c) 2004, Daily News, New York. Distributed by Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News.
MWD, LVMHF, MC, GE, C,