New York Times – The Securities and Exchange Commission has begun a broad examination into whether Wall Street bank employees are leaking information about big trades to favored clients, like hedgefunds, in an effort to curry favor with those clients, executives at Wall Street banks said.<\/p>\n
The inquiry, these people said, seems aimed at determining how pervasive insider trading, or the illegal use of market-moving nonpublic information, may be on Wall Street. Knowledge about a large trade, like the sale of a big block of stock by the mutual fund giant Fidelity, would tell a trader which way the stock would move.<\/p>\n
Trading ahead of client orders, or front-running, has long been an issue on Wall Street. Large mutual fund companies have often complained in the past that Wall Street brokerage firms were front-running their trades, using information about the funds\u00c3\u00a2\u00e2\u201a\u00ac\u00e2\u201e\u00a2 plans to buy or sell to make a risk-free bet on a stock\u00c3\u00a2\u00e2\u201a\u00ac\u00e2\u201e\u00a2s direction.<\/p>\n
But the latest S.E.C. investigation appears to have a new twist: Rather than examine whether a bank is trading ahead of its own client by using knowledge of the customer\u00c3\u00a2\u00e2\u201a\u00ac\u00e2\u201e\u00a2s trade, the scope of the investigation will allow regulators to see if banks tip their valued customers who then go trade at another bank, making the paper trail harder to detect.<\/p>\n