Breaking Hedge Fund News






Each business day HedgeCo.Net keeps you informed with the top hedge fund industry news, opinion and insight from around the globe. From the latest hedge fund launches, to the impact of regulation, competition, and investor activism - we track the topics and people that make a difference to you.

Explore the most informative hedge fund articles and take the news with you, using HedgeCo's Hedge Fund News RSS

Still want more? Browse the hedge fund blogs, authored by hedge fund industry experts.


News Categories
Today is Sunday, February 12, 2012 at 
- Countdown to Market Close:
Posts Tagged ‘guarantors’

World business leaders back more regulation

Wednesday, November 12, 2008 : Permalink

MSN UK News – Business leaders around the world back greater regulation in response to the global financial crisis, a survey showed on Wednesday, with support strongest for curbs on credit rating firms, hedge funds and structured finance.

Responses from more than 700 chief executives, chairmen, partners and directors across Asia, Europe and the United States were received between November 4th and 6th.

The survey, conducted by international law firm Allen & Overy, was timed ahead of this weekend’s Washington DC summit on the deepening crisis between the leaders of the Group of 20 leading world economies.

More than three-quarters of those polled agreed that more regulation of credit rating agencies was necessary, while two thirds supported greater regulation of hedge funds.

Read Complete Article

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

trackback from your site.

Shocker! Steve Jobs Blames It All on Hedge Funds

Thursday, September 11, 2008 : Permalink

New York Times – To the ranks of chief executives who blame those terrible meanies who run hedge funds for their troubles — Jeffrey Skilling at Enron, say, or Jimmy Cayne at Bear Stearns, or Patrick Byrne at Overstock.com — we can now add a new name: the one and only Steve Jobs. According to Jim Goldman, who interviewed Mr. Jobs today on CNBC after his latest razzle-dazzle product announcement, the Apple chief executive said the rumors that he had suffered a recurrence of cancer came from “hedge funds with a big short position in Apple.”

Let’s quickly review the facts: In June, Mr. Jobs, who survived pancreatic cancer four years ago, appeared at an Apple developer’s conference looking gaunt and haggard. Naturally, investors worried that the cancer had returned. At first, Apple’s public relations folks lied — saying he had a common bug. Then, the company refused to say anything at all, even when asked during a conference call by an analyst. “Steve’s health is a private matter,” was the party line. 

So today, Mr. Jobs appeared on stage under a sign that read, “The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated” before plugging the latest iteration of iPods. These fairly minor product announcements got enormous attention as a result. So apparently, during marketing events at least, he is willing to put aside his privacy concerns. Interesting.

Read Complete Article

Tags: , , , , , , ,

trackback from your site.

Candidates Must Decide on Government Role in Financial Markets

Tuesday, September 9, 2008 : Permalink

New York (HedgeCo.Net) – The recent controversial moves of Henry Paulson and the U.S. Treasury have Washington divided not only on the future of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but on government’s new role in the U.S. mortgage market.   

On Monday, Paulson and Federal Housing Finance Agency Director James Lockhart placed the two mortgage giants in a conservatorship, allowing the government to replace chief executives and eliminate their dividends, while giving them themselves the power to purchase up to $200 billion of stock in the companies.   A new program has also been launched to purchase mortgage-backed securities from the two firms, starting with $5 billion worth this month.  In accordance with the government assistance, Fannie and Freddie will have to eventually reduce their holdings of mortgages and mortgage backed securities.  

This decision was months in the making, after downplaying problems and staving off rumors of a government bailout.  Finally, Bush came out and called the situation an “unacceptable” risk for an economy that has been battered by the subprime fallout and the worst housing slump since the great depression.  

"Allowing the companies to fail or further deteriorate would damage our home mortgage market, and could weaken other credit markets that are unrelated directly to housing," Bush said in his statement.  "Americans should be confident that the actions taken today will strengthen our ability to weather the housing correction and are critical to returning the economy to stronger sustained growth."  

The two companies guarantee about half of the nation’s $12 billion in outstanding mortgages.  For months, amidst rumors of capital shortages, Fannie and Freddie denied any problems.  It was only after Paulson hired Morgan Stanley to probe into the company’s finances did it come to light that the two firms were overstating their capital and did not have sufficient reserves.  Concerns over their finances sent stock prices plummeting and mortgage rates soaring. 

Overall, Fannie and Freddie suffered about $14 billion in losses, leaving the government with a tough decision to make.

Democratic Senator Charles Schumer agrees with the course chosen.  “Paulson has threaded the needle just right by taking necessary action to stabilize U.S. financial markets while minimizing the liability for taxpayers,” he said. “This plan will be met with broad acceptance in Congress because it doesn’t prejudge the ultimate fate of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac."

But while some current political figures may be on board, it is really going to fall on the next administration to determine the role of the government in matters such as this, and ultimately, the fate of the both Fannie and Freddie.  

"The new Congress and the next administration must decide what role government in general, and these entities in particular, should play in the housing market,” Paulson said in Washington.  “There is a consensus now that they cannot continue in their current form.”  

However, the fear of alienating voters has forced both candidates to spew nothing more than political rhetoric while never fully disclosing their position on this issue.  While Obama pushes for “some” invention and McCain expresses that there must be a surge of “confidence,” it is unclear what either of their stances are on the role of the government in matters such as this.  

Lately there has been an increase in the government’s role in the financial markets.  Six months ago, the Fed infamously funded the $30 billion in financing needed to rescue Bear Stearns and facilitate the purchase by JPMorgan.  There are several permanent courses of action that may be taken with Fannie and Freddie, including a full blown nationalization that would cement the government’s role in the markets permanently.  Whatever the course chosen, it will most likely fall on the watch of the next presidential candidate.  It’s about time to put politcal jargon aside and pick a side.

Julie Scuderi
Senior Editor for HedgeCo.Net
Email: julie@hedgeco.net

HedgeCo.Net is a premier hedge fund database and community for qualified and accredited investors only. Membership on www.hedgeco.net is FREE and EASY. We also offer FREE LISTINGS for Hedge Funds!
Be sure to check out our sister sites. For more information, visit www.hedgeconetworks.com

 

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

trackback from your site.