HedgeCo.Net Columnists
Aaron Wormus is the managing director of HedgeCo Networks, and part-time financial and technology blogger for Wormus.com.
» View Aaron Wormus
Alex Akesson is the author of Hedgefunds-Weblog.com, providing breaking news and interviews for the hedge fund industry.
» View Alex Akesson
Peter J. de Marigny is Portfolio Manager of DITMo® Strategies, an Equity Hedge, Aggressive-Income Objective, Buy/Write Portfolio for an Aggressive-Income Objective used as an Enhanced Cash investment vehicle. Pj is also Head of Risk Alternative Strategies for Newport Beach, CA advisor Renovatio Asset Management. » View Peter J. de Marigny
Ryan Conner is Principal at HedgeCo Securities. As an experienced industry veteran, Ryan Conner offers his opinions on the hedge fund industry and hedge fund strategies.
» View Ryan Conner
Rashida Fleet is involved with consulting and working with managers during the fund launch phase. Her work includes; interviewing managers, collecting information for the HedgeCo database and contributing to the HedgeCo News feed.
» View Rashida Fleet
Tim Seymour is co-founder and managing partner of Red Star Asset Management, as well as Chief Operating Officer of the $116 million Red Star Double Alpha Fund.
» View Tim Seymour
Richard Heller Richard Heller is a partner at the New York City law firm of Thompson Hine LLP. His experience is in the formation of private offerings for hedge funds as well as the formation of registered broker-dealers and RIAs.
» View Richard Heller
Bret Rosenthal Principal of RCM, LLC, and founding partner of the Fortune's Favor Family of Funds.
» View Bret Rosenthal
Cameron Hight, CFA, is an investment industry veteran with experience from both buy and sell-side firms, including CIBC, DLJ, Lehman Brothers and Afton Capital. He is currently the Founder and President of Alpha Theory™, a Portfolio Management Platform designed to give fundamental money managers the ability to create their own repeatable discipline to organize the complex process of portfolio management.
» View Cameron Hight





Today, I’d like to address a curious phenomenon developing in the Treasury market.

March 31st supposedly marked the end of the Fed’s quantitative easing (Q.E.) phase. We were told the Fed would no longer print money and buy mortgage backed securities. There was, of course, no discussion about the Fed printing money and buying other assets. However, ‘ending Q.E.’ carries certain implications and it would not be a stretch to say market participants were led to believe Q.E. in all forms was coming to an end.

Enter ‘curious phenomenon’: Treasury market behavior since March 31st would suggest Q.E. is alive and well. During the month of April, long rates rallied from about 4% to roughly 3.7%.  Treasury prices went up as rates went down after the Fed allegedly stopped Q.E.?! Needless to say this is not the response most market participants would expect.

I’m sure we can come up with more than one reason for this Treasury strength. Perhaps the issues emanating from Europe have driven investors into the relative safety of  US debt. Or maybe Goldman Sachs led financial fears are responsible for the Treasury bid.

However, the following excerpt from ‘The Privateer’ (A favorite publication of ours) offers a compelling argument supporting the theory that the Fed is continuing a Q.E. assault on the credit markets. If this theory is accurate, we would expect any equity market selloff to be contained to a normal uptrend retracement. Moreover, precious metals prices should continue to advance as more Q.E. equals further currency debasement which is a tasty recipe for higher Gold and Silver prices….

The US Treasury auctioned $11 Billion worth of “TIPS” on April 26. They started to sell the regular stuff on April 27 with an auction of $44 Billion in two-year paper. With the Greek debt downgrade to “junk”, hardly anyone noticed. Hardly anyone, that is, except the bidders for US Treasury paper. Indirect bidders (read foreign central banks and governments) bid for only 28 percent of the paper, down substantially from the average demand in 2009.

But much more troubling was the massive 24 percent of the paper on offer taken by the so-called “direct bidders”. The rest was presumably taken by the “primary dealers” in Treasury paper. The “direct bidders” had taken as much as 10 percent of the auction on only 12 of 42 auctions since July last year. They had taken that much only six times in all the auctions held by the US Treasury in the FIVE years from the beginning of 2004 until the end of 2008.

Even more disquieting, the identity of those who are included as “direct bidders” is never disclosed. The fact that the amount of Treasury debt taken by “direct bidders” has blown out since the Fed officially ended its quantitative easing at the end of October 2009 has led to speculation that the Fed has not REALLY ended its policy of monetising Treasury debt after all. More and more analysts (including some mainstream analysts) have come to the conclusion that the “direct bidder” is none other than the Fed. They are almost certainly right, but nobody can know for sure because the “direct bidders” are secret….

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Stock Market Investing:

The Equity markets were down across the board Friday as the week ended. Last week was a week of churning and distribution, two actions I hate to see during a market advance as they often mark the end of a rally. To make matters worse the churning has occurred at key areas of resistance on all three major averages; 10,000 on the DOW, 2200 on NASD and 1100 on the S&P 500. Investment Strategy: Turning more cautiousSo, with this negative week still fresh on the mind, it seems appropriate to evoke the immortal words of Andy Grove, “Only the paranoid survive” and discuss three possible developments that could derail the bull.

Development One: Economic numbers that suggest recovery begin to outpace negative economic news. This leads to the perception — or possibly, the reality — that the Fed will reverse its stance on easy credit.

If you are a new reader I strongly advise the perusal of past post before you begin your protest. Those of you who are familiar with my work will know the well documented relationship between bad economic numbers, easy credit, weak US$ and strong equity markets. As long as the Fed remains committed to easy credit in all its forms the bull market can continue.

However, I have witnessed a disturbing trend over the last few weeks. Good news on the economy leads to selling. This suggests to me a real fear pervades the markets with regard to the continuation of easy credit. The equity markets are trading at these lofty levels because of liquidity not reality and if the Fed controlled gravy train of easy credit stops then trouble will ensue. When the gravy stops dog will eat dog. What the distribution of the last few weeks may be telling us is that the big dogs are smelling trouble and are preparing.

Today’s trading offers a perfect illustration of Development One. First, good earnings numbers out of Microsoft & Amazon were not able to move the markets higher. Instead the excitement was used by the big players to distribute their holding. Second, the following “good” economic report hit the news wires this morning, but the equity markets sold off almost immediately after the release:

Existing Home Sales Exceed Expectations
Existing home sales jumped 9.2% to 5.57 million units in September. The increase followed an unexpected decline (-2.9%) of sales in August. The consensus was expecting sales to rise by a much more modest 5.1% to 5.35 million units.

 

Beyond the headline sales numbers, there was another good piece of news from the data release. Distressed properties, which accounted for almost 50% of sales throughout the spring and summer, have declined significantly to only 29%. Sales of non-distressed homes make it more likely that consumers will start looking at more expensive properties as homeowners move up the pricing ladder. The increase in sales helped push the total available supply down to 7.8 months.

 

 

We obviously don’t have the answer to these questions. However, this very real possibility must be respected. There has always been a high correlation between long rates and the equity markets. I can think of no better example than the crash of 1987. For four months the bond market was collapsing (rates rising) before the equity markets infamously followed.

Of course, in ’87 bonds sold off because the Fed was tightening. If, however, bonds sell off even in the face of Fed easy credit policies then I hate to see the ensuing equity market response.

Record Auctions Announced…euro 1.5001…yen 91.5060 (3.411% -07/32)
Treasury will sell a record batch of bonds next week with $44B 2-yrs Tuesday, $41B 5-yrs Wednesday and $31B 7-yrs Thursday. The record levels show an increase of $1B on the 2-and-5s, and $2B on the 7-yrs. There will also be $7B reopened 5-yr TIPS going off Monday along with $29B 3-mos and $30B 6-mos. The market may get some relief as the news is over, but the high end of expectations had been for closer to $115B versus the $116B announced, so any relief may be brief.

Development Three: The high profile SEC take down of Galleon may cause a ripple effect leading to hedge fund unwinds.

Galleon had over $3 billion and now according to DJ-Galleon winding down all hedge funds.

Last year we all witnessed what happens when hedge funds are forced to unwind. Many of the big funds are often involved in the same trades and one unwind leads to another. There will be many denials along the way but the equity markets will speak the truth.

I will also respectfully submit to you, the readers, that the derivatives crisis is far from over. The individuals that created the credit crisis are still running the show. If you believe this statement is incorrect or feel President Obama promised you change so his cabinet must be full of new thinkers, I suggest you view the PBS Frontline documentary entitled The Warning .

The Warning brings to mind two obvious questions:

1- What will cause the next derivatives crisis? Could it be the take down of a major hedge fund that ignites the next collapse?

2- Why isn’t Brooksley Born a major member of the Obama administration? If he was truly an agent for change wouldn’t she be a must in the cabinet?

Development Two: A funding crisis unfolds.
Will the US$ decline in value to a point where long rates must increase aggressively for our government to continue funding its debt? How long will China and others tolerate the ruse of quantitative easing before demanding higher rates?

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Today’s consumer sentiment numbers offer immediate confirmation that the issues I raised in yesterday’s post are clear and present dangers to the continued recovery of the debt and equity markets.

As of this post, equity markets are down about 1.5% across the board, which is not surprising.

However, the rally in the US$ and the US treasury market are in my estimation a head fake. The US$ has rallied a bit in the last week or so due to belief that a recovery will allow the Fed to shrink it’s balance sheet. US treasuries have rallied because participants believe the economic recovery will pave the way for less stimulus and debt issuance.

Clearly, this sentiment data along with the dismal July retail sales data and awful initial jobless claims data paint an altogether more ominous picture. This picture does not bode well for the US$ or the Treasury market.

ECONX Some Sobering Sentiment Data
The preliminary report on consumer sentiment for August from the University of Michigan caught the market by surprise and not in a good way. The index dipped to 63.2 from 66.0 in July. The consensus estimate was 69.0. The current conditions index dropped to 64.9 from 70.5.

The August reading here is unsettling considering it is below the level seen in February when the stock market was much lower and the unemployment rate wasn’t as high. The economic outlook index fell to 62.1 from 63.2. That is the lowest reading since March when this category measured 53.5…

Ultimately, it is income that drives spending, but the weak confidence measure is a sobering reminder of the psychological (and real) effects of a weak labor market that has been accented by a growing mass of workers (1 out of every 3 unemployed) that has been unemployed for 27 weeks or longer. The economic data overall might suggest in the months ahead that the recession is over, but this confidence report goes to show it will feel like a recession for a lot of people a lot longer than some production data says it should.

Tags: , , , ,