Inflation concerns have been on economists’ minds since the Fed started passing drastic measures to combat our country’s troubled economy. Now, as the worst of the storm appears to be behind us, the concerns about the repercussions of our government’s monetary actions are under the microscope. The Fed’s commitment to keep the interest rate near zero for the next year has fueled speculation that other central banks will raise interest rates first—which would make other currencies more attractive than the dollar. Australia’s decision last week to raise interest rates already hurt the dollar and suggested that resource-based economies might recover quicker, and be more attractive to investors, than the United States. 

 The V-Shaped Climb 

              As manufacturing gains its footing, the stock market strengthens, housing inventories fall and retail spending returns; our economy will continue traveling up the V. However, government provides the stability in many market rebounds.  Once government funds are pulled back, the likelihood of dropping back into a recession could increase.

              Until spending is once again a consumer behavior, instead of a government one, the underlying economic problems will remain—threatening to pull us into another deep recession. In order for consumers to spend again, they are going to need to be convinced that their hours will not be cut, their jobs will not be lost and their wages will not be dropped. Of course, before they can be convinced of any of this, the unemployed will have to be reintroduced into the workforce. 

              We will continue wrestling with high unemployment numbers until business owners are confident that their products and services are once again in demand. Currently, businesses are getting by with nearly-depleted inventories. But, as consumer demand rises, business owners will beef up inventories; which will produce the need for more employees in the manufacturing industry. Business owners are scraping by with the bare-minimum number of employees. Larger inventories require new employees to sell, stock, ship and manage the products. 

              So, as consumer demand slowly returns, so too will new jobs. As we crawl out of this recession, a number of positive signs fuel consumer demand. As home prices continue to rise, homeowners will no longer be underwater and their confidence will get a boost. As the stock market continues to climb, so too will investors’ confidence. Major markets are all interrelated. Signs of growth in one market have the ability to positively impact another. The process is slow and filled with pockets of discomfort, but the climb has begun and the journey is forecasted to be slow and steady. Being patient and taking the right steps now will help our economy avoid falling down the second trap in the dreaded W-shaped recovery.  

Protecting Your Wimpy Dollar, Not Fearing it 

              Fearing inflation is a reactive investor’s behavior. This group of investors waits until something drastic happens in the marketplace that demands they respond. Active investors prefer to take more proactive measures to prepare for unappealing market conditions, such as inflation. Wise investors salt the slugs of inflation long before they have the chance to take over their gardens and devalue their investments.

              First, let us be clear that our country still may be on track to side step a nasty bout of hyper-inflation; which could cause a gallon of milk to cost a truckload of fifties. Our policy makers have to make the right decisions as we trudge through this recovery. To recognize the silver lining, an economy needs to have ultra-low unemployment levels and rising wages to effectively foster a period of hyper-inflation—both of which we are lacking at the moment. Unemployment is flirting with the 10-percent mark and real average hourly wages fell from December, when they were at their recent high point, to August at a seasonally-adjusted 1.5 percent.[1]

              Some may consider worries about inflation to be premature, but there are countless signs suggesting that the dollar will continue to considerably weaken over the next couple of years. The most concerning: Our government has borrowed hundreds of billions of dollars in efforts to hold up our banking system and this has added to our country’s already-enormous debt responsibilities. Having far too much money and too few goods is the root cause of inflation. Therefore, the biggest worry is that our government will continue to print money to pay for its extraordinary debt. Even if some experts are arguing that inflation concerns are premature, there are proactive actions an investor can take to protect his or her investments.

              Some assets rise in value during times of inflation and having a dose of them in your investment portfolio can do wonders for its performance. The following are widely-considered to be the best performers:  

·      Real estate: Traditionally, investors have used real estate as a hedge against the spontaneous performance of portfolios that are overloaded with stocks and bonds. Real-estate assets can also act as a hedge against inflation. Plus, today’s affordable prices and availability have real estate looking extremely appealing as an investment opportunity.

·      Commodities: Inflation causes the price of materials to rise. So, why not hold interest in the materials themselves? Investing in commodities through exchange-traded funds can help small investors avoid the many drawbacks that come with investing in commodities (like deciding where to store 1,000 barrels of oil).

·      Gold: With our currency no longer anchored to gold, it can lose value—and often does. The magic with gold is that it often moves opposite the value of the U.S. dollar.

·      TIPS: Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities are similar to other Treasury securities in that they are long-term IOUs that pay a fixed rate of interest until they mature. But, with TIPS, the government adjusts the payments up or down each month according to inflation levels.  

All My Best, 

Thomas J. Powell 

The discussion of investment strategies in this article should not be considered an offer to buy or sell any investment. As always, consult an investment professional to assist you in meeting your investment goals.

[1] See http://www.bls.gov/news.release/realer.nr0.htm

Tags: 10 percent, central banks, commodities, consumer spending, credit streams, Dollar, gold, hedge, hyper-inflation, Inflation, inventories, IOUs, Real estate, Recovery, TIPS, tips for hedging inflation, trade deficit, unemployment, weak dollar, wise investors

Comments feed (RSS 2.0), comment or trackback from your site.

            Documentarian Michael Moore’s latest project, Capitalism: A Love Story aimed at highlighting a number of flaws concerning the economic system upon which our country is built. In his film, Moore infiltrates Wall Street and Washington D.C. to “explore the root causes of the global economic meltdown.” In one scene, he attempts to make a citizens arrest of the AIG board of directors. In another, he drives an armored car to Merrill Lynch and attempts, kind of, to collect $10 billion on behalf of the American people. While searching for answers in high-profile places, Moore asks financial professionals to explain complex terms, such as derivatives. In an attempt to provide this answer for Mr. Moore, I thought I would revisit a scenario I created last year. The following is a fictional example. It never happened, except for in my head.

            There is and always has been stiff competition between Las Vegas casinos. Located miles from the strip, Sin and Tonic Casino relies on clever ideas from their owner, Dale, to increase profits. In the summer of 2005, Dale decided to unveil a ‘Play Now, Pay Later’ program to his loyal customers. Dale’s customers, most of whom rarely left the casino because they had no home or job to maintain, were allowed to gamble and drink while management kept tabs on how much money they were each blowing through.

            The customers told all of their friends down by the river about Sin and Tonic’s new program and soon the casino was always filled to record numbers for the property.

            Dale decided to lower the payouts on all of his table games and slot machines and also increase the price of alcoholic beverages. But, because his customers were not required to pay right away, no one seemed to complain. Dale’s sales blew through the roof and caught the attention of local banks. One bank referred to Dale’s customers’ debts as “valuable” and offered to increase Dale’s borrowing limit.

            With Dale’s customers’ debts as collateral, the bank turned the debts into securities known as Sin-a-Bonds. Soon, the Sin-a-Bonds were being traded on security markets nationwide. Investors across the country, and soon across the entire world, never knew the AAA-rated Sin-a-Bonds were, in reality, the debts of homeless gambling addicts.

            Leading brokerage firms were selling loads of Sin-a-Bonds and their prices continued to escalate at a surprising rate. Everything was fine until pesky risk managers started poking around and demanding the gamblers to start making payments on their debts. On a busy Saturday night at Sin and Tonic, Dale informed his customers that payments needed to start being made that Monday. The remainder of Saturday night and all day Sunday, Sin and Tonic was filled to capacity.
            On Monday morning Dale and his employees were witness to the first day without customers in the casino’s history. Not one of the customers came in to make payments on their debts and the ones that stumbled around drunk in the parking lot claimed they “hadn’t got no money.” Dale told the bank he could not pay back any of the money they lent him and he quickly decided to claim bankruptcy.

            Sin-a-bonds dropped to near-worthless levels and investors lost their money. Plus, the bank that issued the Sin-a-Bonds saw its capital depleted and they were consequently unable to offer any more loans. The bank laid off all of its employees and closed.

            Dale was unable to pay any of his bills and all the companies that granted him payment extensions had to take massive losses, as Dale was their largest customer. The carpet cleaning service was forced to downsize, the vending companies were left with handfuls of damaged machines that no one else was interested in and alcohol suppliers were left with large inventories that could not possibly be consumed without Dale’s heavy-drinking clientele.

            The brokerage firms that sold the Sin-a-Bonds were in heavy distress. Eventually, the government stepped in to save them by creating a bailout package that was funded by taxpayers from states where gambling is prohibited.

            Dale retired from the casino business and is now rumored to be heavily involved in politics.

Absolute Returns Absolutely

            An increasing number of investment firms looking to capitalize on the fears of their investors have started offering “absolute return” funds that boast the ability to always produce returns. Investment advisors are pushing mutual funds that are designed to produce positive returns no matter how badly the stock market is performing. The idea has been around for decades, but now major financial companies such as Goldman Sachs, Dreyfus and Putnam have all launched similar absolute-return funds.[i] In response to the growing group of clients who want to be able to rely on their portfolio’s positive performance, investment firms have started heavily marketing absolute-return funds. But, are these funds worth all the hype?

            Similar to hedge funds, absolute-return funds focus on making money in all market conditions. By taking long positions in stocks and balancing them with short positions of similar value and in similar assets, absolute-return funds aim to produce returns slightly higher than Treasury bills.  In a dropping market, gains on the short positions are meant to offset losses on the long positions. In a rising market, the long positions are supposed to outperform the shorts; therefore producing modest returns for passive investors. If the sheer makeup of an absolute-return fund is not producing, fund managers also attempt to achieve their target by employing a number of different strategies. For instance, short-selling can help offset market falls and derivatives can shield from undesired volatility.  

            Generally, the techniques used by absolute-return fund managers to stabilize your portfolio’s ride are the sort of diversification practices you can do yourself, without having to pay hefty annual fees. In a recent Reno Gazette Journal article, Registered Investment Adviser Robert Barone recommended the following three steps in order to achieve consistent positive returns:

            First, reduce the allocation to equities in your portfolio to the 30-to-40 percent range. Remember to hold equity positions in companies with sound business practices and low levels of debt.

            Second, increase the allocation to fixed income to the 40-to-50 percent range, but keep the maturities relatively short (no more than three or four years to maturity).

            Third, because of weak dollar policies, increase the normal allocation to commodities to the 10-to-20 percent range.[ii]

            The discussion of investment strategies in this article should not be considered an offer to buy or sell any investment. As always, consult an investment professional to assist you in meeting your investment goals.  

A Broken CIT Will Trip up Small Businesses

            On October 1^st CIT announced the launch of a plan which will aim to enhance its capital and improve its liquidity. According to the official press release, the restructuring plan is designed to “ensure continued financing support for small business and middle market clients.” After being denied financial support from the Treasury in July, CIT was forced to create a restructuring plan in order to attempt to sidestep bankruptcy court. But, because of concerns with CIT’s financial stability, the FDIC has forbidden the company from increasing its deposits, which severely limits the restructuring tools in its belt.

            The target of the restructuring plan is to slice CIT’s $31 billion dollar debt load down to about $25 billion. But, some experts have argued that the amount is not nearly enough to persuade the FDIC to again allow CIT to accept deposits. CIT is offering voluntary exchange offers for certain unsecured notes. Current holders of an “existing debt security would receive a pro rata portion of each of five series of newly issued secured notes, with maturities ranging from four to eight years, and/or shares of newly issued voting preferred stock.”[iii]

            The future success of CIT relies on a significant increase in capital. The restrictions imposed by regulators and the troubling credit freeze have created enormous obstacles for CIT. Financial companies, like CIT, without direct access to Federal Reserve emergency loans rely on funding from short-term debt markets. But, with these markets already shriveled, the possibility of finding new debt buyers has all but disappeared.

            With CIT operating in more than 50 countries, it is peculiar that the government did not deem CIT “too big too fail,” as it has a number of other institutions. The last company of this size that was denied a bailout was Lehman Brothers and its resulting bankruptcy filing tore the financial market to ribbons.

            For over a century CIT has been a huge player in providing loans to small and medium-sized businesses. The company has more than one million corporate borrowers; including popular businesses such as Dunkin’ Donuts and Dillards. If (or when) CIT collapses, the biggest problem will be the scores of small businesses that will find it even more difficult to find capital to fuel their ventures. As constantly noted, small businesses are crucial to our recovery. The credit freeze has already built a wall between businesses and available capital. The crumbling of CIT will only exacerbate the problem and highlight the importance of private capital in the marketplace. Without capital, our financial system cannot begin to encourage economic growth, and without growth a recovery is out of reach.

All My Best,

Thomas J. Powell

Tags: absolute return, absolute return funds, AIG, capital, Capitalism: A Love Story, CIT, credit freeze, derivatives, Dillards, Dreyfus, ELP Capital, FDIC, Goldman Sachs, growth, investment advisors, Merrill Lynch, Michael Moore, Not Categorized, powell perspective, Putnam, Recovery, T bills, Thomas J. Powell, tom powell, Treasury Bills, Wall Street

Comments feed (RSS 2.0), comment or trackback from your site.

            It is now evident that this recession has uncovered a number of substantial flaws in our country’s financial industry. The now-exposed wounds became so complex that it took a meltdown of this size to identify them and it will take a long, sluggish recovery for them to heal. The majority of the flaws in our financial system hit individual investors the hardest. Faced with frauds, unclear loan agreements, mislabeled ratings and much more; individual investors have felt the pain and are now changing their behaviors in order to wisely navigate through this new investment jungle.

            In this new, heavily-battered playing field, I have seen one group of investors disguised as two vastly different types of investors. They appear to have swapped each other spots on the risk spectrum, but the groups are really one in the same. The first type is the group that fears more losses so much that they are persuaded to stay out of the game. The second is the group of investors that has been chasing risky investments in an attempt to quickly recoup the wealth they lost in the crash. Once this type of investor wins back their losses, they pull out and leave the game; joining the first type of investor on the sidelines. These groups share a trait that makes them more similar than different: They both fear the current market.

Emotion and speculation fueled many investors before the bust and will certainly again fuel the masses during the next boom. The tendency to chase easy money is in our hardwiring and it is a difficult force to resist. Now, as is the case immediately following any recession, investors are cautious. But, this caution should do more than lead to rampant mattress stuffing. Investors should now be more willing to seek the knowledge that will allow them to make more informed decisions. The bust knocked the wind out of the majority of individual investors. Many were forced into being cautious but all can use this new caution to their benefit.

Rather than abandon investing, now is the time to be fine tuning your investment strategy by getting back to the fundamentals. Rebalance your portfolio in a way that makes sense. Hold stocks in companies with good business models. Learn to make informed decisions. Demand transparency. Get in the habit of practicing prudent due diligence or search for an expert who you trust will. Instead of letting the fear of uncertainty keep you on the sidelines, analyze your risks, lower your uncertainty and reestablish your place on the field.  

Unleashing Small Business Horsepower

Small businesses have historically been the force that pulls our country out of tough economic times. Their ability to work more efficiently allows them to find innovative ways that spur job creation. But, without being able to find available capital, small businesses are restrained. A full recovery will not take hold until small businesses have access to adequate capital. The mega businesses have been propped up by the government, but small businesses heavily rely on the private-capital investments that are currently lacking.   

Investing in small businesses has many advantages. From a business stance, while larger corporations have strayed from their original initiatives, small businesses usually have focused business plans that detail their near-future commitments. Yet, small businesses still tend to be more flexible, which is a huge advantage considering the amount of ideas that small businesses produce. Without flexibility and the willingness to take educated risks, their ideas would have no Petri dish in which to grow. Another advantage is that small businesses usually carry less debt than large corporations; which use debt as a primary ingredient in their financial engineering. Less debt equals fewer obligations, and this can translate into quicker returns for investors.

No matter how simple or complex a small-business investment appears, it is important to always keep in mind a few basics. First, invest in small businesses that have solid business models that you believe in. Just because a company has filed with the state to sell its securities does not mean that the investment will be a success. Businesses succeed because of vision and follow-through. Remember that “publicly-traded” does not necessarily mean “better.” Second, do not let an employee of a company convince you that an investment is not risky, that is a lie. Companies will often have securities salespeople who work on a commission. This does not mean they are automatically corrupt, it just means do not let their promises replace your due diligence. Plus, investments ALWAYS carry some level of risk. Which brings me to my last point: Always carry through with proper risk analysis. There are registered investment advisors, lawyers and other financial professionals that can help take the headache out of the process. Do not pinch pennies early on in the investment process only to be burned later by a flaw that a professional could have identified and corrected.

These are terrific times for investing in small businesses. There are countless opportunities to invest your capital in quality projects that will produce high returns. With credit not rushing like it did before the bust, business owners are actively searching for ways to acquire capital. Our recovery will continue to look and feel like a false hope until small businesses have the means to expand, create jobs and put people back to work. 

Hanging on by a Home-Buyer Tax Credit

The $8,000 first-time homebuyer tax credit, included in the economic stimulus plan passed in February, is set to expire next month. The credit is widely touted as having given the stagnant housing industry its first sales jolt after a lengthy lull following the housing market’s implosion. Now, with legislation in recess, officials will be forced to scramble if they wish to extend the tax credit.

With a fast-approaching deadline of November 30^th, many in the real-estate and construction industries have their fingers crossed that an extension will be filed and keep buyers approaching the market. Last month, some groups, such as the National Association of Home Builders, even launched newspaper advertising campaigns pleading for the extension of the credit. Several members of Congress have either drafted bills or showed support for bills in favor of extending and expanding the home-buyer tax credit. U.S. Senator John Isakson (R-Ga.) introduced a bill that would extend the program through 2010 and increase the amount to $15,000. Also, Isakson’s version would be available to all homebuyers, regardless of current ownership status or income level (the current tax credit is limited to first timers who make under $75,000 annually).

Nearly everyone agrees that the residential housing industry has been using the first-time homebuyer tax credit as a crutch; and therefore has managed to stay on its feet. However, not everyone agrees the tax credit should be extended. While many experts worry how the housing industry will fair when the tax credit expires, they also agree that a true housing-market recovery will be delayed until natural economic forces replace government support. Outside of the tax credit, the government currently provides support to home buyers in multiple ways. While attempting to thaw the credit freeze, the Fed has kept the interest rate at or around zero. This encourages lending, which includes home mortgages. Also, the current tax code already shows great support for home ownership by providing incentives such as deducting the interest on your mortgage.

A number of senators have been criticized that they support an extension because it would favor their states heavily. While this may be true for those states that have been badly bruised by the housing implosion, an extension is likely to benefit real-estate markets across the country. The general consensus is that extending the tax credit would continue to encourage buyers to explore the market. But, passing an extension depends on Congress giving attention to the matter before the November 30^th deadline—for there is no shortage of higher-profile issues waiting to be addressed in September and October.  

All My Best,

Thomas J. Powell 

Tags: bail-out, credits, debt, ELP Capital, Fed, financial engineering, home-buyer tax credit, housing market, Investing, meltdown, mortgage, provate capital, real estate investments, recession, Recovery, risk economy, small business, speculation, stimulis, stock market, tax credit, Thomas J. Powell, tom powell

Comments feed (RSS 2.0), comment or trackback from your site.

           As markets continue to produce signs of stabilization over the next quarter, it is unlikely that unemployment figures will show much improvement. With figures the highest they have been in more than 25 years, unemployment appears to have neared its peak. Lowering the rate to levels our economy can adequately support will prove to be a daunting task. But, with a little encouragement the corporate sector certainly has the power to handle it.

            Last week, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke was quoted by multiple major news sources after he told the Brookings Institute, “The recession is likely over at this point.”[1] According to Bernanke, the economy appears to be growing, but not at a pace that will be sufficient for lowering the unemployment rate. Historically, economic upturns after recessions have been stamped with consumer demand. This time around, however, many Americans may not have the ability to help lead a recovery because they have been completely wiped out financially.

            In order to spur consumer-led demand, the corporate sector will again have to make jobs readily available. The unemployed are not the kind of consumers that are needed to invigorate our economy and induce growth. We do not need to turn to an economics textbook to tell us that our broken economic cycle can be patched with more available jobs—this much we know.

            Corporations large and small have been forced to adapt to this constricted economy and the majority of them were required to do so through downsizing. Now, company leaders are reluctant to increase their workforce until they are confident there is a significant increase in demand for their products and services. But, one strong possibility that could provide the encouragement needed to get company leaders hiring again is a temporary change in corporate tax policy.

            A temporary tax break aimed at equaling the payroll costs of adding new employees would strip the risk for companies that are awaiting a full-blown recovery before they hire. Plus, according to a recent article published in The Wall Street Journal:

“The impact of a two-year program on the federal deficit would be relatively modest. Using a conservative set of assumptions, an $18 billion annual program, which represents 10% of estimated corporate tax receipts in the next fiscal year could create nearly 600,000 good-paying jobs …”[2]

            Before they commit to hiring, companies are waiting for consumers to spend. But, before consumers commit to spending, they are waiting for companies to hire. The cycle is stagnant and will remain so until one side is persuaded to change their behavior. A government-sponsored tax break for companies that agree to hire could be the first action taken during this recession that encourages our country’s government, companies and individuals to work together.

Capital River is Frozen; We Can Thaw it

            Because of the severe impact of the recession, the stream of capital that once flooded our economy has been reduced to a trickle. The majority of the flow evaporated when banks were forced by the Fed to tighten their lending standards as delinquent loans polluted their books. Consequently, failing to restore the flow is making it extremely difficult for the Fed to take progressive measures toward recovery and has the potential to drop us back into another recession.

            According to Bloomberg.com:

“The Fed’s second-quarter survey of senior loan officers, released Aug. 17, showed U.S. banks tightened standards on all types of loans and said they expect to maintain strict criteria on lending until at least the second half of 2010.”[3]

With dropping values in commercial real estate, rising unemployment numbers and a seemingly unending onslaught of delinquent mortgages; banks are not lacking reasons to practice strict lending measures. Earlier this year, through a series of stress tests, the Fed found that 19 of the country’s largest banks needed $75 billion in new capital to protect themselves from mounting losses.

            With all of my recent writings and blog postings concerning the benefits of getting our private capital back in the game, I am by no means hiding my agenda for restoring capital flow. The economy will only be repaired once the flow of capital is rejuvenated. It is much easier to lead capital tributaries back into the main stream if they are first flowing. Over the next couple of quarters, banks will continue to deleverage and work toward a balanced lending system. But, without raising more private capital, banks will not be able to establish a lending system that enables credit-worthy individuals and businesses to acquire reasonable loans; which puts an enormous restraint on economic progress.

            Our economy is already positioned to attempt to force a jobless recovery, which will certainly create complications in sustaining a recovery. Trying to force a credit-less recovery will only exacerbate our struggles. Dragging our banks through a painful recovery without sufficient capital will only position them to break and lead us right back through more of the same. By identifying ways to put our private capital back into the equation we are positioning our financial system to rise from this recession stronger and more efficient. By investing in private enterprise, we are sparking long-term, mutually-beneficial relationships between capital-producing businesses and banks (while also earning gracious returns on our initial investments). Now is the time to put our private capital back to work.

Without Our Capital, Banks Get the Axe

            Our private capital plays an integral part in our local economies—which then all collectively have crucial roles in our country’s financial stability. Because banks have become over-reliant on easy credit, they are now struggling to keep their businesses running by raising capital the old fashioned way. Without our capital, our banks (and more importantly our communities) cannot function properly. Not able to fulfill their debt obligations, banks are closing their doors and falling under the control of the FDIC; which “estimates bank failures will cost the fund about $70 billion through 2013.”

            Banks are necessary to ensure that money circulates in our communities. They distribute the money of their depositors to borrowers who have a worthwhile purpose for the money. The banks secure our savings and lend the money to companies or individuals. Banks provide a convenient location for borrowers to acquire funds. Without banks, companies would find it very difficult to borrow large sums of money.

While banks perform their role as intermediaries, they also essentially increase the supply of money. By accepting deposits from its customers and loaning the money to worthy borrowers, banks “create” money. Consider the following simple example. Imagine a customer deposits $20,000 into her bank account. Even though the bills are no longer in circulation, the amount of money in our country does not change as a result of the deposit. Allowing the money to simply sit in the bank’s safe would not earn the bank anything. Therefore, the bank lends $10,000 to an entrepreneur in return for an additional interest fee. The depositor still has a $20,000 credit in her account and the entrepreneur has $10,000, therefore the money supply has increased by $10,000. The entrepreneur purchases supplies with the money and creates a product that he sells for a profit. As long as banks have depositors, they are able play their crucial role of increasing the money supply by making funds available to those looking to find backing for their ventures.

            The word “bank” itself is derived from the Italian word “banca,” which referred to the table on which coins were counted and exchanged in the middle ages. “Bancarotta,” from which the word “bankrupt” was derived, means “broken bank.” Originally, if a banker was unable to pay his debts, the authorities arrived to smash his table in half with an axe. Today, the FDIC seizes failed banks and seeks buyers for their branches, deposits and faulty loans—all, for some reason, without smashing anything with an axe.

All my best,

Thomas J. Powell 

Tags: banks, Bernanke, Credit, economy, ELP Capital, entrepreneur, FDIC, Federal Reserve, las vegas, markets, Money, nevada, obama, private capital, Real estate, real estate investments, recession, Recovery, reno, tax, Thomas J. Powell, unemployment

Comments feed (RSS 2.0), comment or trackback from your site.

That’s Mr. Risk to You, Real-Estate Investor

Whether you are looking to invest in commercial property or a new primary residence, the opportunities in the current real-estate downturn are nearly everywhere you look, even Detroit. The pressure to lock in low mortgage rates has many investors champing at the bit. Plus, the approaching December 1^st deadline for obtaining the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act tax credit is pushing first-time home buyers off the fence and into the game. But, as investors return to the real-estate market and the inventory of existing homes shrinks, a race to capture the last of the low prices may soon inhibit investors from executing adequate risk management.

With all of the current real-estate investment opportunities, it is crucial to not become blinded by the seductive home prices and appealing tax incentives. Investors with all levels of experience can protect their investments by recognizing and preparing for risk. While some precautions may be required by your lender, such as homeowners insurance, many others are going to be your responsibility. There are three primary ways you can help to prepare yourself for the majority of risks that come bundled with real-estate investing.

First, examine the current market in which you are looking to purchase property. Assess what is available and for what price. Also, what is the current level of buyer interest in the area you are considering? These questions will help you get your bearings within the local market and also increase your negotiation power later on in the process. Only a few cities are investing heavily in improving their infrastructure, but this might help persuade your decision if there are finalized plans for improvements in your considered property’s vicinity. Remember, since real-estate is a long-term investment, it is important to consider the area’s future. With adequate research you can identify some signs that can help you make a wise investment decision.

Second, aim to understand the laws and regulations involved with your considered property. I am not suggesting you become an attorney to make a wise investment, but being well-versed in the legal documents that are involved will behoove you. No matter how seasoned of an investor you are, few things can help you better prepare for risk than understanding the rights and requirements of your property’s regulations.

Third, consider your payment options. When considering your funding options, consider how long you intend to keep the property. The days of no-documentation loans and 100-percent financing loans are behind us, for now. So, thankfully, the trickery exercised by lenders in the middle of the decade should no longer overwhelm you or persuade you into signing something you do not understand. However, it is still crucial to do your homework. Knowing which type of loan you are comfortable with and which is most affordable will help throughout the loan-approval process.

When treating real estate as a long-term investment, it proves to be one of the least-risky options. However, real-estate is still not immune to risk. By taking the precautions mentioned in this article and continuing to be proactive in minimizing risk after you acquire the property, you will allow your investment to work for you. More importantly, you will avoid the tense, nerve-racking roller-coaster ride that comes when you are sideswiped by costly risks you could have prepared for.

Too Old For Risk?

We have all heard the old rule of thumb that states 100 minus your age should be the percentage of your portfolio that is comprised of stocks. This is meant to serve as an attempt to keep your amount of individual stocks manageable. After the recent market meltdown, however, many experts are recommending that even that number may be too high … and major stock funds are adapting.

With the onslaught of baby boomers set to retire, fund managers at major firms have been aiming to develop a stable stock program for older investors. The idea is to keep baby boomers investing in stocks instead of in a safer alternative with lower returns, such as Treasury bills. The various funds have been trying to develop an investment vehicle that combines the stability of T bills with the higher returns offered, sometimes, by stocks.

Older investors are primarily interested in a steady stream of income. Therefore, mutual fund managers have been designing funds that will occasionally hold more bonds to ensure they protect their ability to keep providing an income even in down markets. For example, last year Deutsche Bank created a series of mutual funds aiming to turn volatile stocks into stable investments. Deutsche’s fund managers spent more than a year developing the mutual funds for retirees. However, in the midst of the market meltdown, the fund was forced to abandon all of its stocks for bonds. They were then buckled by poor market performance. Plus, because of a warranty they gave their investors in order to originally entice them, they were then unable to switch back to stocks and had to return their investors’ money.

If an idea is too good to be true, it usually is. A number of mutual funds are aiming to provide stable investments with high returns. Furthermore, they are looking to do so while not tying up the money for years. Alright, so maybe by applying gigantic up-front costs, these fund managers may be on to something. However, they are also attempting to provide investors with the perk of low costs, which renders the creation of such a fund outside of the fundamentals of investing.

While taking on high risk rarely equates to high returns, no risk never translates to high returns. Markets fluctuate and any fund that guarantees high returns all the time cannot survive. Eventually, down markets will affect the fund and the guarantor will be forced to pull the plug or significantly cut returns. Older investors may not have the same appetite for risk that they had in their 20s, but that does not make it any easier to create the world’s first no-risk, stable-income-producing mutual fund.

Come On Risk, I Can Take It

After the recent positive signs presented by stock and bond markets, herds of investors have been lining up to sink their money into what could be the beginning of a rebounding market. Fed up with national performance, many investors have started looking to foreign stock markets for an opportunity. Eager to recoup the massive losses experienced over the last 18 months, investors are anxious to have financial markets, either domestic or foreign, once again work for them. Investors are also impatiently waiting for the bottom of the market to rear its head in order to purchase assets at their lowest possible price. The two schools of behavior have investors opening their arms and welcoming more risk, even if their money has to perform overseas.

Risky emerging-market mutual funds have attracted eager investors in massive swarms. According to Morningstar Inc., investors have dumped $4.9 billion into emerging-markets mutual funds over the first five months of this year, after only pulling out $2.6 billion in all of 2008.[i] While some foreign markets have been on a significant rise as of late, pouring loads of money into any one type of investment still brings about significant risk for investors. Doing so takes investors’ concerns off of their long-term investment goals and they become caught up in chasing short-term performance.

Thanks to positive performance in the stock markets of developing countries, investors are becoming more optimistic about dedicating a larger part of their portfolio to emerging-markets funds. According to The Wall Street Journal:

Not only do investors have a greater appetite for risk these days, they’re also more optimistic about the economic outlook for some of these countries. In China, the world’s third-largest economy, the government’s massive stimulus is starting to take effect. While exports are still down, internal growth is gaining strength. Meanwhile, commodity prices have been on the rise, improving confidence in Brazil and Russia.[ii]

While emerging- markets funds have experienced an average of 33 percent returns, experts are predicting a bumpy ride ahead. Many financial experts are predicting that emerging-markets economies will grow at a faster rate than the U.S. for the next several years. But, the recent rally by investors in emerging-markets funds is not expected to continue for long, which will calm the spike. Therefore, investors should continue to keep a well-balanced portfolio and calm the urge to shift large portions of money into emerging-markets funds in an effort to quickly recoup last year’s losses.

Tags: Emerging Markets Funds, Real estate, Recovery, Risk, Risk Management, Thomas J. Powell

Comments feed (RSS 2.0), comment or trackback from your site.