Tea Leaves; in the last couple of days there have been a lot of them, so let’s start reading:The tangible parts of GS’s earnings were suspect (Investment Banking -38%, Asset Management -6%, Trading and Principal Investments -7%) while the FICC unit (Fixed Income, Currency, Commodities) showed all the gain. “Net revenues in FICC were $5.99 billion, significantly higher than the third quarter of 2008. These results reflected strong performances in credit products and mortgages, which were significantly higher compared with a difficult third quarter of 2008.” In other words, last quarter this division had mark downs and this quarter the assets were marked up. Is that a sign of a strong business or clever accounting? ECONX Industrial Production Surges
Industrial production rallied for the third consecutive month as production increased 0.7% in September. The consensus expected a much more moderate increase of only 0.2%. The jump in production was expected to be driven by the auto industry, and the sector didn’t disappoint as motor vehicle production rose 8.1% as assemblies of autos and light trucks increased 13.0% to 7.15 million vehicles.What has been the Fed’s response to all these tea leaves? Read on…

Fed’s Fisher says keep rates low, inflation not a risk - Reuters.com
Reuters.com reports the U.S. economy is recovering but the upturn will be slow and it makes no sense to raise interest rates in this climate since inflation is not a risk, a top Federal Reserve official said.(I humbly suggest someone clue in Fisher to the reality that (all together now) Inflation is a currency event, not an economic event.)

Earnings from the technology space, Intel & Google to name a couple, have been well above expectation. This could be a positive development, but of course expectations are a joke. Analysts constantly get it wrong so let’s dispense with the “better than expectations” farce. A note a caution on the Intel number and others on that end of the food chain; an inventory rebuild is occurring at an aggressive pace. This rebuild is only a good thing if consumers spend. I would be more apt to cheer a good earning number out of, say Best Buy, as that would show end user demand. Inventory build without end user demand spells trouble for the economy in Q1 of 2010.

I am loath to discuss the earning of the banks. JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs showed strong results. However, when we parse the numbers it appears that earning were again created with clever accounting.

 JP Morgan’s results were similar to GS. Should we cheer or should we be concerned with this ugly little fact buried in the announcement: “JPMorgan’s loss provision to cover current and future home loan defaults rose to $3.99 billion, while its provision for credit card losses surged to $4.97 billion”

We will choose to be concerned. However, the share prices of the financial group remain in an uptrend and while it may be stupid to believe the earning “surprises” it may be equally stupid to fight the trend of higher share prices. I would suggest you keep the above discussion in the back of your mind so when prices begin to falter you will not be the proverbial “deer in the head lights.”

A review of our investment strategy may be in order before we begin the reading of economic tea leaves. I have established over the last few months that the inflation trade is under way. Assets are inflating, both the commodity and equity markets, because of increasing U.S.$ weakness. Hence, weak economic numbers are actually positive for the aforementioned markets because the Fed can not raise rates and defend the U.S.$ while the economy is still in trouble.

So, how is the economy looking?

 The numbers were even better than the headline suggested as total manufacturing excluding motor vehicle production rose a healthy 0.5%. This includes strong growth in consumer goods excluding motor vehicles, which jumped 0.3%.

There is a drawback to the strong production numbers. We have not seen orders for manufactured goods pick up. If orders stay low we could end up with a big increase in manufacturer inventories. This would cause manufacturers to pull back on their production. If this scenario occurs, manufacturing production will see a “double-dip” as production rises today and quickly falls back in a few months.

Ok, we know from the recent spat of “good” earnings that production is up, but as we discussed this will be negative down the road if consumers don’t wake up.

How is the consumer doing…? Briefing: October University of Michigan Sentiment-prelim 69.4 vs 73.3 consensus. This was a bad miss and could spell trouble. Again I will say, this is good for stock market investing.

One reason for this bad Michigan number may be related to the on going problems in real estate as evidenced by this Fitch story…

Fitch Sees 60% of Current RMBS Borrowers Underwater

“The majority — 60% — of remaining performing borrowers within ‘06- and ‘07-vintage residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) bear negative home equity, meaning they are underwater on their mortgages and owe more than their houses are worth.The rating agency noted the number of non-agency borrowers 90 plus days delinquent reached 1.66m in September — the highest level on record. The rating agency expects US unemployment to peak at 10.3% in the middle of next year, further pressuring current borrowers. House prices will ultimately decline another 10% over the next year.”

“I am worried about unemployment and I see an enormous amount of slack. I hear it everywhere,” Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas President Richard Fisher told Reuters in an interview. “I am super-hawkish on inflation. I don’t think that is where the risks are right now,” Fisher said.

His comments will reinforce the impression that the U.S. central bank is in no hurry to raise interest rates,despite guarded optimism that the U.S. economy is healing. Fisher, who takes pride in a reputation as an anti- inflation policy hawk, said the U.S. central bank would not lose sight of its long-term obligation to keep price pressures at bay. But he stressed that this was not the current issue. “Right now that is not the risk. The risk is a disinflationary/deflationary risk,” he said…

Fisher, who is not a voting member of the Fed’s policy-setting committee this year, said it would take “a while” to work off excess capacity in the economy. “I don’t see a ‘V’-shaped recovery. I see a couple of quarters of growth and then the question is where do we go from there. That is the real key question in 2010 and 2011.”

Tags: central bankers, Fed, Fisher, Goldman Sachs, Google, Inflation, intel, interest rates, investment strategy, JP Morgan, new global currency, stock market investing, US$

Comments feed (RSS 2.0), comment or trackback from your site.

I’m not hearing much about this story in the news yet but I suspect the debt-ceiling will become center stage in the weeks ahead. At risk is the fate of the US$ trend. In the unlikely event that congress somehow puts its proverbial foot down and refuses to increase the debt ceiling then no doubt this would stem the slide of the greenback. However, I suspect the third paragraph holds the tastiest morsel of information. In order to avoid looking weak on fiscal responsibility right before an election Congress will pass all that is required now to increase the debt ceiling and in turn add to the US$ weakness. Stay tuned, this could get interesting….

Treasury gets ready for debt-ceiling fight - WSJ
WSJ reports the Obama administration, concerned about the possibility of a big political fight over the national debt, is looking at how it can continue funding the government in the event that Congress hinders its ability to borrow money.

Treasury Department officials are examining tools employed by previous administrations, including disinvesting government retirement funds and suspending interest payments to federal accounts, according to people familiar with the matter. They are also looking at what to do in the unlikely event of a govt shutdown.

At issue is the debt ceiling, a dollar limit controlled by Congress that dictates how much the U.S. can borrow. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner told the Senate in a letter last month that the $12.1 trillion ceiling could be hit as early as mid-October, and said it needs to be increased so the U.S. can continue funding operations and making debt payments. Mr. Geithner didn’t indicate the increase he was seeking. With the U.S. borrowing about $30 billion a week, some economists say the Treasury will need an increase of as much as $1.5 trillion if it wants to avoid another request before the 2010 midterm elections. The U.S. could default on its debt if Congress doesn’t raise the debt ceiling, but it is a remote scenario.

…Meanwhile, as the players in the US rearrange the chairs, the rest of the world wants to rewrite the playbook…

UN wants new global currency to replace dollar - Daily Telegraph Daily Telegraph reports the dollar should be replaced with a global currency, the United Nations has said, proposing the biggest overhaul of the world’s monetary system since the Second World War.

In a radical report, the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) has said the system of currencies and capital rules which binds the world economy is not working properly, and was largely responsible for the financial and economic crises. It added that the present system, under which the dollar acts as the world’s reserve currency , should be subject to a wholesale reconsideration. Although a number of countries, including China and Russia, have suggested replacing the dollar as the world’s reserve currency, the UNCTAD report is the first time a major multinational institution has posited such a suggestion.

In essence, the report calls for a new Bretton Woods-style system of managed international exchange rates, meaning central banks would be forced to intervene and either support or push down their currencies depending on how the rest of the world economy is behaving. The proposals would also imply that surplus nations such as China and Germany should stimulate their economies further in order to cut their own imbalances, rather than, as in the present system, deficit nations such as the UK and US having to take the main burden of readjustment

I’d like to take a moment and pose a question before you read the next story.

Now the question: Should you start a trade war with China at a time when your country is most vulnerable? Would that be smart? Would it be diplomatic? Or, in the immortal words of Jaime Lee Curtis, would it be STUPID? (Extra credit to those who can name the movie)

China strikes back on trade - WSJ
The Wall Street Journal reports China indicated Sunday it would restrict U.S. imports of chicken and auto products after Washington’s move to slap punitive sanctions on Chinese tire imports, raising tensions in a trade dispute ahead of two planned meetings between the countries’ leaders.

Citing a jump in Chinese imports, the Obama administration said Friday it would impose stiff tariffs on Chinese-made tires for the next three years, invoking a section of trade law that China agreed to as a condition for its joining the WTO in 2001. The move essentially would cut off the source of nearly 17% of all tires sold in the U.S. last year and hit cost-conscious consumers particularly hard, as retailers will have to find alternative sources for the lower-end tires that make up much of what China sends to the U.S.

Beijing responded quickly. Sunday, its Ministry of Commerce said it was starting antidumping procedures against U.S. exporters into China of chicken and auto products. It said it had received complaints from local producers that the U.S. products were being dumped in China at below-market prices. The ministry denied that the move, which could lead to sanctions, was protectionist. “China has consistently opposed trade protectionism, and the country’s actions since the financial crisis have reflected this stance,” the ministry said on its Web site. “China is willing to continue to act in accordance with countries around the world to push forward the world’s economic recovery.”

The announcement didn’t specify the timing or the exact kinds of goods involved. An official with the U.S. Trade Representative’s office Sunday defended the trade decision and warned that Washington would be “inquiring closely” over the next several days as to the basis for China’s response.

Tags: bretton woods, China, debt-ceiling, new global currency, obama, trade war, treasury department, U.S. Dollar, US Treasury

Comments feed (RSS 2.0), comment or trackback from your site.