<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hedge Fund Blogs From HedgeCo.Net &#187; GM Bankruptcy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hedgeco.net/blogs/tag/gm-bankruptcy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hedgeco.net/blogs</link>
	<description>HedgeCo.Net Hedge Fund Blog &#38; Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:07:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>News that Moves: GM Bankruptcy &amp; Obama Comments, Fed Mortgage Efforts, California&#8217;s &#8216;A&#8217; rating in question</title>
		<link>http://www.hedgeco.net/blogs/2009/06/01/news-that-moves-gm-bankruptcy-obama-comments-fed-mortgage-efforts-californias-a-rating-in-question/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hedgeco.net/blogs/2009/06/01/news-that-moves-gm-bankruptcy-obama-comments-fed-mortgage-efforts-californias-a-rating-in-question/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bret Rosenthal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Not Categorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fed Mortgage Efforts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Comments about GM Bankruptcy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hedgeco.net/blogs/?p=511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Securitization is like fertilizer. You can grow tomatoes or blow up buildings. -Simon Mikhailovich RCM Comment: The government sponsored bankruptcy of GM goes into effect today. President Obama tried to give an encouraging speech this morning from the White House stressing his desire not to run a car company. He tried to make it clear [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em><span style="130%;"><span style="times new roman;"><span class="blsp-spelling-error">Securitization</span> is like fertilizer. You can grow  tomatoes or blow up  buildings.</span></span></em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em><span style="130%;"><span style="times new roman;">-Simon <span class="blsp-spelling-error">Mikhailovich</span></span></span></em></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="#000099;"><span style="130%;"><span style="times new roman;"><span class="blsp-spelling-error">RCM</span> Comment: The government sponsored bankruptcy of  GM goes into effect today. President Obama tried to give an encouraging speech  this morning from the White House stressing his desire not to run a car company.  He tried to make it clear that government ownership of corporations was not the  goal. As Shakespeare would say, &#8220;The lady doth protest too much, me thinks.&#8221; &#8211;  Hamlet (III, ii, 239)</span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="times new roman;">US  treasury bond prices plummet (yields rise), the US$ continues to sell off vs. a  basket of currencies, oil up another 3%; the markets are speaking and they don&#8217;t  like this fiscal <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">irresponsibility</span>. </span></p>
<p><span style="times new roman;">Food for  thought that may have salmonella: The government sponsored programs&#8217; total cost  to date equal more than 18% of GDP. This is a gargantuan number. To put it into  perspective, during the entire depression of the 1930s the government programs&#8217;  cost totaled just 7% of GDP. Gold rallied $100 in the month of May, oil up 25%  &#8212; that roar you hear is the wave of hyperinflation headed our  way.</span></p>
<p><span style="times new roman;">RCM  Comment: When governments interfere with business this is usually the  result&#8230;</span></strong><br />
<span style="130%;"><span style="times new roman;"><strong><em>Fed mortgage efforts prove  costly</em></strong> &#8211; <span class="blsp-spelling-error">WSJ</span><br />
<span class="blsp-spelling-error">WSJ</span> reports the U.S. Federal <span class="blsp-spelling-error">Reserve&#8217;s</span> program to keep  mortgage rates low by buying securities and Treasury bonds so far has <span style="#cc0000;">been costly and seems to be having a fleeting  impact</span>. An analysis of the timing of the Fed&#8217;s purchases of  mortgage-backed securities by J.P. Morgan Chase shows the Fed is <span style="#cc0000;">&#8220;under water&#8221; on its portfolio by about 10%,</span> and  it would have to take about $5 billion in losses if it were to mark its  portfolio to the market. <span style="#cc0000;">The Fed has spent about  $2,500 per borrower, by J.P. Morgan&#8217;s analysis &#8212; more than it costs a typical  mortgage borrower to refinance their debt.</span> Higher fees and adjustments  based on a borrower&#8217;s credit score or home&#8217;s value have been an impediment to  borrowers looking to refinance a mortgage, damping the refinancing wave the Fed  hoped for, analysts say. </span></span><br />
<strong><br />
</strong><span style="130%;"><span style="times new roman;"><strong><span style="#000099;">RCM Comment: This is just the beginning, other states to  surely follow&#8230;</span></strong><br />
</span></span><span style="130%;"><span style="times new roman;"><strong><em>Fitch revises to negative the  outlook of the state of California&#8217;s &#8216;A&#8217; rating<br />
</em></strong>Fitch Ratings  affirms the &#8216;A&#8217; long-term general obligation (GO) bond rating on the State of  California and <span style="#cc0000;">revises the Rating Outlook to  Negative</span> from Stable. The revision in the Outlook to Negative also  applies to the state&#8217;s GO Veterans, economic recovery, and other bonds tied to  the general credit of the state. The state&#8217;s long-term &#8216;A&#8217; rating is based on  its broad economy and a moderate, though growing, debt burden. However,  California&#8217;s &#8216;A&#8217; rating is the lowest among U.S. states, due to its revenue  volatility and the fiscal inflexibility posed by voter initiatives. The revision  of the Outlook to Negative reflects growing concerns with the state&#8217;s widening  budget and cash flow deficits&#8230;.</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hedgeco.net/blogs/2009/06/01/news-that-moves-gm-bankruptcy-obama-comments-fed-mortgage-efforts-californias-a-rating-in-question/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

