<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hedge Fund Blogs From HedgeCo.Net &#187; earnings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hedgeco.net/blogs/tag/earnings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hedgeco.net/blogs</link>
	<description>HedgeCo.Net Hedge Fund Blog &#38; Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:16:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>G.O.P takes Mass., Market Reaction to G.O.P Win, Housing Starts Plummet, FHA Lifts Fees</title>
		<link>http://www.hedgeco.net/blogs/2010/01/20/g-o-p-takes-mass-market-reaction-to-g-o-p-win-housing-starts-plummet-fha-lifts-fees/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hedgeco.net/blogs/2010/01/20/g-o-p-takes-mass-market-reaction-to-g-o-p-win-housing-starts-plummet-fha-lifts-fees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bret Rosenthal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Not Categorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commodities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FHA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G.O.P.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing starts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treasury bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US$]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hedgeco.net/blogs/?p=1713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[G.O.P. takes Massachusetts Senate seat – NY Times NY Times reports Scott Brown, a little-known Republican state senator, rode to an extraordinary upset Tuesday night when he was elected to fill the Senate seat that was long held by Edward M. Kennedy in the overwhelmingly Democratic state of Massachusetts. By a decisive margin, Mr. Brown [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>G.O.P. takes Massachusetts Senate seat – NY Times </em></p>
<p><em>NY Times reports Scott Brown, a little-known Republican state senator, rode to an extraordinary upset Tuesday night when he was elected to fill the Senate seat that was long held by Edward M. Kennedy in the overwhelmingly Democratic state of Massachusetts. By a decisive margin, Mr. Brown defeated Martha Coakley, the state’s attorney general, who had been considered a prohibitive favorite to win just over a month ago after she easily won the Democratic primary. With all precincts counted, Mr. Brown had 52% of the vote to Ms. Coakley’s 47%. “Tonight the independent voice of Massachusetts has spoken,” Mr. Brown told his cheering supporters in a victory speech, standing in front of a backdrop that said “The People’s Seat.” The election left Democrats in Congress scrambling to salvage a bill overhauling the nation’s health care system, which the late Mr. Kennedy had called “the cause of my life.” Mr. Brown has vowed to oppose the bill, and once he takes office the Democrats will no longer control the 60 votes in the Senate needed to overcome filibusters. There were immediate signs that the bill had become imperiled. House members indicated they would not quickly pass the bill the Senate approved last month.</em></p>
<p><strong><span>There is hope! Can the American people bring balance back to our capital as well as some much need accountability? Yes, we can! Yes, we can! Yes, we can!</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span>I’m not suggesting Brown is the embodiment of all that is good, but I am saying this is a wakeup call for the political machine that has been grinding the American dream assunder.  A dream that was never built on handouts and entitlements but instead on entrepreneurial spirit, individual freedom and hard work.</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span>Ok, enough of the patriotism. How will this news affect the investment world? I expect the immediate reaction will be a fiscal responsibility trade. The US$ will rally and Treasury bonds will catch a bid as yields go lower. Meanwhile, commodity prices will suffer as will equity prices. However, this trade will not last long. The economic situation is not improving despite all the financial media cheerleading of the last few months. The reaction to Q4 earnings has been disappointing, as we predicted. Companies have been unable to hide the fact that organic growth is nonexistent. Add to this disappointing earnings picture the Brown victory in Massachusetts and you get a recipe for another stimulus package before the November elections.  Hence, the idea of fiscal responsibility is a pipedream.    </span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span>If one would care to argue the economic picture is becoming brighter I offer Exhibit A:</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>Housing Starts Plummet</em></strong></p>
<p><em>Housing starts continued their up one month, down the next trend as starts fell 4.0% from 580,000 in November to 557,000 in December. The consensus expected starts to fall only 8,000 to 572,000…The <strong>drop in starts was completely attributed to a lack of single-family construction.</strong> Single-family home starts fell 6.9% from 490,000 in November to 456,000. It seems builders are well aware of the pitfalls of starting new construction given that the latest increases in existing and new home sales were propped up by government support. Since <strong>new homes constructed today would not come onto the market until after the government stimulus expires, it makes sense that builders would hold off on beginning new single-family homes until they are sure demand has stabilized</strong>….</em></p>
<p><strong><span>The housing starts number is volatile, you say. Things can still get better, you dream. Not without more government stimulus, I reply. And I offer Exhibit B as another nail in the coffin of a housing recovery:</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>FHA to Lift Mortgage Insurance Fees – WSJ</em></strong></p>
<p><em>The Federal Housing Administration will announce more-stringent lending requirements and higher borrower fees on Wednesday to cushion against rising defaults and stave off the need for a taxpayer bailout of the agency.</em></p>
<p><em>The FHA, which has taken on a major role in the housing market during the economic downturn, doesn’t lend money to home buyers, but insures lenders against default on loans that meet FHA criteria. In exchange for that backing, borrowers who take out FHA-backed loans must pay an upfront insurance premium, currently set at 1.75% of the total loan amount. The premium can be rolled into the loan.</em></p>
<p><em>The FHA is set to raise that fee to 2.25%, the second increase in the past two years, according to people familiar with the matter. The value of the FHA’s reserves to cover losses has fallen to $3.6 billion, about 0.5% of the $685 billion in loans outstanding, down from 3% a year earlier. Congress requires the agency to maintain a 2% capital-reserve ratio. If the larger upfront fee had been in place last year, the FHA would have boosted its reserves by more than $1 billion.</em></p>
<p><em>Also to boost the reserve, the FHA will ask Congress to increase a separate insurance fee that borrowers pay annually, people said. If the agency were to run short of cash to cover projected losses, it likely would have to ask Congress for money for the first time ever.</em></p>
<p><span><strong>This move by the FHA will have the effect of rising rates for FHA borrowers (those most in need of a loan with the worst credit) resulting in a further reduction of demand. With the end of government incentives and the effective increase in mortgage rates is it any wonder housing starts are plummeting?</p>
<p>Rosenthal Capital Management runs the Fortune’s Favorite Family of Funds, including Fortune’s Favor I, Fortune’s Favor Precious Metals and Fortune’s Favor Offshore. For more information visit </strong><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.rosenthalcapital.com/" target="_blank"><em><span><strong>www.rosenthalcapital.com</strong></span></em></a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hedgeco.net/blogs/2010/01/20/g-o-p-takes-mass-market-reaction-to-g-o-p-win-housing-starts-plummet-fha-lifts-fees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FED Will Not Reduce Liquidity, Stock Market Investing, China Theme Continued</title>
		<link>http://www.hedgeco.net/blogs/2010/01/12/fed-will-not-reduce-liquidity-stock-market-investing-china-theme-continued/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hedgeco.net/blogs/2010/01/12/fed-will-not-reduce-liquidity-stock-market-investing-china-theme-continued/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bret Rosenthal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Not Categorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ben bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock market investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US$]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hedgeco.net/blogs/?p=1696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That’s it! I’ve had it! Enough! Let’s dispense with the absurd, ludicrous, vacuous debate about “imminent” Fed tightening.  The financial airwaves and print are full of this idiotic expectation that the Fed will reduce liquidity soon.  Allow me to be clear: THE FED WILL NOT REDUCE LIQUIDITY AT THIS TIME. The Fed cannot reduce liquidity [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span><strong>That’s it! I’ve had it! Enough!</strong></span></p>
<p><span><strong>Let’s dispense with the absurd, ludicrous, vacuous debate about “imminent” Fed tightening.  The financial airwaves and print are full of this idiotic expectation that the Fed will reduce liquidity soon.  Allow me to be clear: THE FED WILL NOT REDUCE LIQUIDITY AT THIS TIME. </strong></span></p>
<p><span><strong>The Fed cannot reduce liquidity because the economic environment is tenuous at best and tragic at worst.  If you don’t want to take my word for this assessment, reading the </strong><a href="http://rosenthalcapital.com/blog/2010/01/the-inherent-trouble-with-too-much-stimulus/"><strong>FOMC minutes from December </strong></a><strong>would be a good start to your education.  You will note that the private session comments from the Fed do not correlate with the public Fed statements made during the same period.  Perhaps this misdirection by the Fed is the cause of all the financial media drivel about possible Fed tightening. Whatever the case, I’ve listed four stories below that should, along with the FOMC’s own emissions,  put to rest the useless notion of Fed tightening.</strong></span></p>
<p><em><span><strong>Stock Market Investing: Expect Q4 earnings, released over the next few weeks, to be lackluster (</strong><a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/stockstowatchtoday/2010/01/11/alcoa-q4-revs-top-ests-turns-cash-flow-positive-eps-light/?mod=rss_BOLBlog"><strong>Alcoa’s announcement</strong></a><strong> today is the first example of disappointment). Subdued EPS results along with continued employment, consumer credit and real estate woes will succeed in limiting the Fed’s ability to change policy. This sad realization will send the US$ lower, commodity prices higher and perhaps extend the equity market rally for a bit longer.</strong></span></em></p>
<p><em><span><strong>Maintain a close watch on the Treasury market. The recent selloff in bonds/increase in rates has been problematic as mortgage rates have climbed. It would be in the best interest of government for a little volatility and weakness to hit the equity markets and drive the fear trade into treasuries effectively bringing down rates. </strong></span></em></p>
<p><strong><em>Miller Tabak on Payroll Figures:</em></strong></p>
<p>Beyond Friday’s lackluster headline payroll figures, the “real” unemployment rate (or U6) rose to 17.3% and the average hourly work week remained near record lows at 33.2. In addition, the average duration of unemployment rose to 29.1 weeks as the ranks of the long-term (or “permanently”) unemployed continue to swell. Furthermore, the household survey showed a decline of 589,000 employed persons to the lowest level since 2003, according to Miller Tabak.<strong></strong></p>
<p>In sum, fewer people are working, more Americans are dropping out of the labor pool and those who are working are working fewer hours: Average hourly earnings up just 2.2% vs. a year ago in December, lowest rate since 2004 and vs. an average gain of 3.3% over the prior decade, according to Miller Tabak.</p>
<p>“Net-net, we are not in your typical WWII recovery and major headwinds still remain,” writes Miller Tabak equity strategist Peter Boockvar.</p>
<p><strong><em>Consumer Credit in U.S. Drops Record $17.5 Billion</em></strong></p>
<p>By Vincent Del Giudice</p>
<p>Jan. 8 (Bloomberg) — Consumer credit in the U.S. dropped a record $17.5 billion in November as unemployment close to a 26- year high discouraged borrowing and banks limited access to loans.</p>
<p>A labor market that’s shed 7.2 million jobs since the recession started in December 2007 is restraining consumer spending that accounts for about 70 percent of the economy. Fed policy makers have said tighter bank lending standards and reductions in credit lines are hampering the recovery.</p>
<p>“Double-digit unemployment is eroding consumer confidence and the uncertainty is prompting consumers to pay down their credit card debts,” said Chris Rupkey, chief financial economist at Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. in New York. “We have not seen such a wholesale reduction in consumer credit since the last time we had double-digit unemployment rate following the early ‘80s recessions.” <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-01-08/consumer-credit-in-u-s-declined-in-november-by-most-on-record.html">READ MORE…</a></p>
<p><strong><em>America slides deeper into depression as Wall Street revels: December was the worst month for US unemployment since the Great Recession began. </em></strong>By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard<strong><em></em></strong></p>
<p>…The Fed’s own Monetary Multiplier crashed to an all-time low of 0.809 in mid-December. Commercial paper has shrunk by $280bn ($175bn) in since October. Bank credit has been racing down a hair-raising black run since June. It has dropped from $10.844 trillion to $9.013 trillion since November 25. The MZM money supply is contracting at a 3pc annual rate. Broad M3 money is contracting at over 5pc….</p>
<p>… This has not stopped an army of commentators is trying to bounce the Fed into early rate rises. They accuse Ben Bernanke of repeating the error of 2004 when the Fed waited too long. Sometimes you just want to scream. In 2004 there was no housing collapse, unemployment was 5.5pc, banks were in rude good health, and the Fed Multiplier was 1.73. <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ambroseevans_pritchard/6962632/America-slides-deeper-into-depression-as-Wall-Street-revels.html">READ MORE…</a></p>
<p><strong>Delinquency rate rises for mortgages – WSJ</strong></p>
<p>WSJ reports more than 6% of commercial-mortgage borrowers in the U.S. have fallen behind in their payments, a sign of potential troubles ahead as nearly $40 billion of commercial-mortgage-backed bonds come due this year. The percentage of loans 30 days or more delinquent rose to 6.07% in December from 5.65% a month earlier, according to data provider Trepp. That is the <strong>highest delinquency rate since the advent of commercial-mortgage-backed securities</strong>.</p>
<p>By year end, delinquency rates on loans for hotels, shopping malls and other commercial properties could rise to between 9% and 14%, according to Jefferies analysts, as high unemployment levels and a depressed housing market inhibit consumer spending. As retailers, hoteliers, restaurateurs and other businesses find it difficult to keep up with their rent payments or to meet rent increases written into their leases, their landlords will find it just as hard to keep up with their mortgages. “As cash flow declines materialize … loans that are current will face pressure,” said Aaron Bryson, an analyst with Barclays Capital.</p>
<p><em><span>Follow up on our <a href="http://rosenthalcapital.com/blog/2010/01/investment-strategy-2010-welcome-to-our-research-room-us-vs-yuan/">China post…</a></span></em></p>
<p><strong>China overtakes US as world’s largest auto market – AFP</strong></p>
<p>AFP reports China’s auto sales surged past those in the United States in 2009 to make the Asian nation the world’s biggest car market, industry data showed, but analysts warned sales would slow this year. The China Association of Automobile Manufacturers said more than 13.64 million units were sold last year, marking an increase of 46.15% from the 9.4 million units sold in 2008, Xinhua news agency reported. Auto output for 2009 increased 48.3% to 13.79 million units, Xinhua said. Calls to CAAM to confirm the figures went unanswered… Analysts welcomed the news, but warned that China car sales could hit the brakes this year. “We are still optimistic about the outlook for this year but it will be quite difficult to achieve the growth rates of 2009,” John Zeng, a Shanghai-based analyst at IHS Global Insight, told AFP. “This year will see a high single-digits growth rate of nine to 10 percent.”</p>
<p><span><em>Rosenthal Capital Management runs the Fortune’s Favorite Family of Funds, including Fortune’s Favor I, Fortune’s Favor Precious Metals and Fortune’s Favor Offshore. For more information visit </em></span><a href="http://www.rosenthalcapital.com/"><em><span>www.rosenthalcapital.com</span></em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hedgeco.net/blogs/2010/01/12/fed-will-not-reduce-liquidity-stock-market-investing-china-theme-continued/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Investment Strategy Turns More Cautious, Existing Home Sales, Record Auctions This Week, Galleon Grief</title>
		<link>http://www.hedgeco.net/blogs/2009/10/26/investment-strategy-turns-more-cautious-existing-home-sales-record-auctions-this-week-galleon-grief/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hedgeco.net/blogs/2009/10/26/investment-strategy-turns-more-cautious-existing-home-sales-record-auctions-this-week-galleon-grief/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bret Rosenthal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Not Categorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2nd stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equity markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galleon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nasd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sp500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock market investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treasury market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US$]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hedgeco.net/blogs/?p=1301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stock Market Investing: The Equity markets were down across the board Friday as the week ended. Last week was a week of churning and distribution, two actions I hate to see during a market advance as they often mark the end of a rally. To make matters worse the churning has occurred at key areas [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="#000099;"><em><strong>Stock Market Investing:</strong> </em></span></p>
<div><span style="large;"><span style="130%;"><strong>The Equity markets were down across the board Friday as the week ended. Last week was a week of churning and distribution, two actions I hate to see during a market advance as they often mark the end of a rally. To make matters worse the churning has <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">occurred</span> at key areas of resistance on all three major averages; 10,000 on the DOW, 2200 on <span class="blsp-spelling-error">NASD</span> and 1100 on the S&amp;P 500. <em>Investment Strategy: Turning more cautious</em></strong></span></span><span style="large;"><span style="130%;"><strong>So, with this negative week still fresh on the mind, it seems appropriate to evoke the immortal words of Andy Grove, &#8220;<em>Only the paranoid survive</em>&#8221; and discuss three possible developments that could derail the bull. </strong></span></span></div>
<p><span style="large;"><span style="#000099;"><span style="times new roman;"><span style="130%;"><span style="#000099;"><span style="times new roman;"><span style="130%"><span style="large;"><strong>Development One: Economic numbers that suggest recovery begin to outpace negative economic news. This leads to the perception &#8212; or possibly, the reality &#8212; that the Fed will reverse its stance on easy credit. </strong></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="large;"><strong><span style="130%;">If you are a new reader I strongly advise the perusal of past post before you begin your protest. Those of you who are familiar with my work will know the well documented relationship between bad economic numbers, easy credit, weak US$ and strong equity markets. As long as the Fed remains <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">committed</span> to easy credit in all its forms the bull market can continue. </span><br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="large;"><strong><span style="130%;">However, I have witnessed a disturbing trend over the last few weeks. Good news on the economy leads to selling. This suggests to me a real fear <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">pervades</span> the markets with regard to the continuation of easy credit. The equity markets are trading at these lofty levels because of <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">liquidity</span> not reality and if the Fed <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">controlled</span> <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">gravy</span> train of easy credit stops then trouble will ensue. When the <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">gravy</span> stops dog will eat dog. What the distribution of the last few weeks may be telling us is that the big dogs are smelling trouble and are preparing. </span><br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="large;"><span style="130%;"><strong>Today&#8217;s trading offers a perfect illustration of Development One. First, good earnings numbers out of Microsoft &amp; Amazon were not able to move the markets higher. Instead the excitement was used by the big players to distribute their holding. Second, the following &#8220;good&#8221; economic report hit the news wires this</strong> <strong>morning, but the equity markets sold off almost immediately after the release:</strong></span><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="large;"><span style="times new roman;"><span style="130%;"><strong><em>Existing Home Sales Exceed Expectations</em></strong><br />
Existing home sales jumped 9.2% to 5.57 million units in September. The increase followed an unexpected decline (-2.9%) of sales in August. The consensus was expecting sales to rise by a much more modest 5.1% to 5.35 million units. </span></span><br />
</span></p>
<p> </p>
<div><span style="large;"><span style="times new roman;"><span style="130%;">Beyond the headline sales numbers, there was another good piece of news from the data release. Distressed properties, which accounted for almost 50% of sales throughout the spring and summer, have declined significantly to only 29%. Sales of non-distressed homes make it more likely that consumers will start looking at more expensive properties as homeowners move up the pricing ladder. The increase in sales helped push the total available supply down to 7.8 months.</span></span></span></div>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="large;"><span style="times new roman;"></span></span> </p>
<p><span style="130%;"><span style="large;"><strong>We obviously don&#8217;t have the answer to these questions. However, this very real possibility must be respected. There has always been a high correlation between long rates and the equity markets. I can think of no better example than the crash of 1987. For four months the bond market was collapsing (rates rising) before the equity markets infamously followed. </strong></span></span></p>
<p><span style="large;"><strong><span style="130%;">Of course, in &#8217;87 bonds sold off because the Fed was tightening. If, however, bonds sell off even in the face of Fed easy credit policies then I hate to see the <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">ensuing</span> equity market response. </span><br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="large;"><span style="130%;">Record Auctions Announced&#8230;euro 1.5001&#8230;yen 91.5060 (3.411% -07/32)<br />
<span style="#cc0000;">Treasury will sell a record batch of bonds next week </span>with $44B 2-yrs Tuesday, $41B 5-yrs Wednesday and $31B 7-yrs Thursday. The record levels show an increase of $1B on the 2-and-5s, and $2B on the 7-yrs. There will also be $7B reopened 5-yr TIPS going off Monday along with $29B 3-mos and $30B 6-mos. The market may get some relief as the news is over, but the high end of expectations had been for closer to $115B versus the $116B announced, so any relief may be brief. </span><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="large;"><span style="#000099;"><span style="times new roman;"><span style="130%;"><strong>Development Three: The high profile SEC take down of Galleon may cause a</strong> <strong>ripple effect leading to hedge fund unwinds.</strong> </span></span></span><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="large;"><span style="times new roman;"><span style="130%;"><span style="#000099;"><strong>Galleon had over $3 billion and now according to</strong> </span><span style="#000000;">DJ-</span>Galleon winding down all hedge funds. </span></span><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="large;"><strong><span style="130%;">Last year we all witnessed what happens when hedge funds are forced to unwind. Many of the big funds are often involved in the same trades and one unwind leads to another. There will be many <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">denials</span> along the way but the equity markets will speak the truth. </span><br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="#000099;"><span style="130%;"><span style="large;"><strong>I will also <span class="blsp-spelling-error">respectfully</span> submit to you, the readers, that the derivatives crisis is far from over. The individuals that created the credit crisis are still running the show. If you believe this statement is incorrect or feel President Obama promised you change so his cabinet must be full of new thinkers, I suggest you view the PBS <span class="blsp-spelling-error">Frontline</span> documentary entitled </strong></span></span><a href="http://video.pbs.org/video/1302794657"><span style="times new roman;"><span style="130%;"><span style="#225799;"><span style="large;"><strong><em>The Warning</em> </strong></span></span></span></span></a><span style="times new roman;"><span style="130%;"><span style="large;"><strong>. </strong></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="large;"><strong><span style="#000099;"><span style="times new roman;"><span style="130%;"><em>The Warning</em> brings to mind two obvious questions:</span></span></span><br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="large;"><strong><span style="130%;">1- What will cause the next <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">derivatives</span> crisis? Could it be the take down of a major hedge fund that ignites the next collapse?</span><br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="130%;"><span style="large;"><strong>2- Why isn&#8217;t <span class="blsp-spelling-error">Brooksley</span> Born a major member of the Obama administration? If he was <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">truly</span> an agent for change wouldn&#8217;t she be a must in the cabinet?</strong></span></span></p>
<p><strong><span style="#000099;">Development Two:</span> <span style="#000099;">A funding crisis</span> <span style="#000099;">unfolds.<br />
</span></strong><span style="large;"><strong><span style="130%;">Will the US$ decline in value to a point where long rates must increase <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">aggressively</span> for our government to continue funding its debt? How long will China and others tolerate the ruse of quantitative easing before demanding higher rates?</span><br />
</strong></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hedgeco.net/blogs/2009/10/26/investment-strategy-turns-more-cautious-existing-home-sales-record-auctions-this-week-galleon-grief/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Q2 EPS, LIBOR-OIS Spreads Narrow, July Retail Sales, Initail Jobless Claims</title>
		<link>http://www.hedgeco.net/blogs/2009/08/14/q2-eps-libor-ois-spreads-narrow-july-retail-sales-initail-jobless-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hedgeco.net/blogs/2009/08/14/q2-eps-libor-ois-spreads-narrow-july-retail-sales-initail-jobless-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bret Rosenthal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Not Categorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alan greenspan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equity markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[initial jobless claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[july retail sales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hedgeco.net/blogs/?p=761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Second quarter earnings can be best characterized as light on revenue but strong on cost cutting, leading to better than expected EPS. The more positive bottom line results have helped fuel the equity market rally over the last couple of months. Meanwhile, Aug. 13 (Bloomberg) &#8212; The Libor-OIS spread narrowed to a level former Federal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="130%;"><span style="large;"><strong>Second quarter earnings can be best characterized as light on revenue but strong on cost cutting, leading to better than expected <span class="blsp-spelling-error">EPS</span>. The more positive bottom line results have helped fuel the equity market rally over the last couple of months.</strong> </span></span></p>
<p><span style="#000099;"><span style="times new roman;"><span style="130%;"><span style="large;">Meanwhile, <span style="#000000;"><em><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a50peaH.llZ0"><span style="#225799;">Aug. 13 (<span class="blsp-spelling-error">Bloomberg</span>) &#8212; The <span class="blsp-spelling-error">Libor</span>-<span class="blsp-spelling-error">OIS</span> spread narrowed</span></a> to a level former Federal Reserve Chairman </em></span></span></span></span><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a50peaH.llZ0"><span style="130%;"><em><span style="large;">Alan Greenspan</span></em></span></a><span style="times new roman;"><span style="130%;"><span style="large;"><span style="#000000;"><em> said he regarded as “normal,” adding to evidence the freeze in credit markets is thawing.</em></span> <strong>Clearly credit market <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">stabilization</span> has been a major driver of the equity market rally. </strong></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="130%;"><span style="large;"><strong>While the rally has been a nice <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">reprieve</span> from the bear market the question remains what will compel the markets higher in Q3 and Q4. With credit back to normal that driver is off the table and cost cutting/belt tightening can only work to improve <span class="blsp-spelling-error">EPS</span> for a short period of time. Revenue must accelerate in the 2<span class="blsp-spelling-error">nd</span> half of the year for this bear market rally to turn into a <span class="blsp-spelling-error">bonafide</span> bull market. </strong></span></span></p>
<p><span style="times new roman;"><span style="130%;"><span style="large;"><strong><span style="#000099;">With that thought in mind I am publishing the next two stories. If the consumer can&#8217;t find a job then spending will not return and revenue will continue to be disappointing. I fear this will result in a resumption of the down trend in the back half of the year. </span><br />
</strong></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="130%;"><span style="large;"><strong>Of course, these are long term questions and as my Mom always says &#8220;you must live the questions; the answers reveal themselves.&#8221; &#8220;Living the questions&#8221; in this case means trading the trend while keeping your eyes open and your mind alert.</strong></span></span></p>
<p><a href="https://www.briefing.com/GeneralContent/Platinum/Active/TickerSearch/TickerSearch.aspx?PagePrefix=IN&amp;Ticker=ECONX"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" style="130%;"><span style="large;">ECONX</span></span></a><span style="130%;"><span style="large;"> </span></span><span style="times new roman;"><span style="130%;"><span style="large;"><strong><em>July Retail Sales Disappoint<br />
</em></strong>The July Retail Sales report is a disappointment and yet another reminder, in the midst of a rising stock market, that the consumer isn&#8217;t all he/she used to be due to weak wage growth, depressed asset prices, and concerns about job security&#8230; </span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="130%;"><span style="large;">For the month retail sales were down -0.1%. Excluding autos, they were down -0.6%. Both figures were well off the consensus forecasts that called for increases of 0.8% and 0.1%, respectively. The government doesn&#8217;t provide any context behind the numbers, but with broad declines in most sales categories, it is clear that consumers weren&#8217;t doing a lot of discretionary spending. </span></span></p>
<p><span style="130%;"><span style="large;">There will be a tendency to dismiss the weakness as being the result of consumers delaying purchases to take advantage of tax-free holidays that got pushed into August this year. There will likely be some makeup in August, but there is still no other way to read the July data than to consider it a disappointment. To the latter point, retail sales, excluding autos, gasoline station, and building materials, which is a measurement that flows into GDP estimates, was down for the fifth straight month. </span></span></p>
<p><a href="https://www.briefing.com/GeneralContent/Platinum/Active/TickerSearch/TickerSearch.aspx?PagePrefix=IN&amp;Ticker=ECONX" target="_new"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" style="130%;"><span style="large;">ECONX</span></span></a><span style="times new roman;"><span style="130%;"><span style="large;"> <em><strong>Initial Claims Still Way Too High </strong></em></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="130%;"><span style="large;">Initial jobless claims for the week ended August 8 increased to 558,000 from a revised 554,000 in the prior week. The current number lifted the 4-week moving average to 565,000 from 556,500. Continuing claims, in contrast, fell 141,000 to 6.202 million. That dropped the 4-week moving average for the series to 6.259 million from 6.287 million. <span style="#cc0000;">There is cold comfort in the drop in continuing claims since it most likely reflects people losing benefits.</span> To be sure, there isn&#8217;t much hiring happening&#8230; Separately, while the trend in initial claims has been better of late, a reading north of 500,000 at this point is still downright bad and still well above prior recession levels when the 4-week average for claims was closer to the 400,000-450,000 range. The labor market is weak and these figures <span style="#cc0000;">aren&#8217;t a great portent for</span> <span style="#cc0000;">consumer spending activity</span>.</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hedgeco.net/blogs/2009/08/14/q2-eps-libor-ois-spreads-narrow-july-retail-sales-initail-jobless-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FASB Rule Changes, All Hail the Blue Dogs, SOHU/CYOU/GLW Earnings</title>
		<link>http://www.hedgeco.net/blogs/2009/07/27/fasb-rule-changes-all-hail-the-blue-dogs-sohucyouglw-earnings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hedgeco.net/blogs/2009/07/27/fasb-rule-changes-all-hail-the-blue-dogs-sohucyouglw-earnings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bret Rosenthal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Not Categorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blue dogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CYOU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health-care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOHU]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hedgeco.net/blogs/?p=685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RCM Comment: We must keep an eye on this major development. If FASB stands firm and makes the changes desired then possibly 3rd and certainly 4th quarter earnings announcements for financial companies should be entertaining. These changes would make it exceedingly more difficult for the financial group to hide and misrepresent the true conditions of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="#000099;"><span style="times new roman;"><span style="130%;"><span style="large;"><strong><span class="blsp-spelling-error">RCM</span> Comment: We must keep an eye on this major development. If <span class="blsp-spelling-error">FASB</span> stands firm and makes the changes desired then possibly 3rd and certainly 4<span class="blsp-spelling-error">th</span> quarter earnings announcements for financial companies should be entertaining. These changes would make it exceedingly more <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">difficult</span> for the financial group to hide and misrepresent the true conditions of the business. </strong></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="times new roman;"><span style="130%;"><span style="large;"><em>Accountants Gain Courage to Stand Up to Bankers: Jonathan <span class="blsp-spelling-error">Weil</span></em> July 23 (<span class="blsp-spelling-error">Bloomberg</span>) &#8212; Turns out America’s accounting <span class="blsp-spelling-error">poobahs</span> have some fight in them after all. Call them crazy, or maybe just brave. The Financial Accounting Standards Board is girding for another brawl with the banking industry over mark-to-market accounting. And this time, it’s the <span class="blsp-spelling-error">FASB</span> that has come out swinging. </span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="130%;"><span style="large;">It was only last April that the </span></span><a href="http://www.fasb.org/" target="_blank"><span class="blsp-spelling-error"><span style="130%;"><span style="large;">FASB</span></span></span></a></p>
<div><span style="large;"><span style="130%;">caved to congressional pressure by passing emergency rule changes so that banks and insurance companies could keep long-term losses from crummy debt securities off their income statements. </span></span></div>
<div><span style="large;"><span style="130%;">Now the <span class="blsp-spelling-error">FASB</span> says it may </span><a href="http://www.fasb.org/cs/ContentServer?c=FASBContent_C&amp;pagename=FASB/FASBContent_C/ActionAlertPage&amp;cid=1176156351499" target="_blank"><span style="130%;"><span style="large;">expand</span></span></a></span></div>
<div></div>
<p><span style="large;"></p>
<div><span style="large;"><span style="times new roman;"><span style="130%;">the use of fair-market values on corporate income statements and balance sheets in ways it never has before. Even loans would have to be carried on the balance sheet at fair value, under a preliminary decision reached July 15. The board might decide whether to issue a formal proposal on the matter as soon as next month&#8230;.<em><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&amp;sid=a5BsXz90CMso"><span style="#225799;">READ MORE</span></a></em></span></span></span></div>
<div><span style="large;"><span style="times new roman;"><span style="130%;"><em></em></span></span></span></div>
<div><span style="large;"><strong><span style="#000099;"><span style="times new roman;"><span style="130%;"><span class="blsp-spelling-error"><br />
RCM</span> Comment: Let&#8217;s take a <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">moment</span> and give the Blue Dogs some credit. At least some group in Washington appears to be awake. </span></span></span><br />
</strong><br />
<a href="https://www.briefing.com/GeneralContent/Platinum/Active/TickerSearch/TickerSearch.aspx?PagePrefix=IN&amp;Ticker="></a></span></div>
<div></div>
<p></span><span style="large;"></p>
<div><span style="large;"><span style="times new roman;"><span style="130%;"><em>&#8220;Blue Dog&#8221; Democrats hold health-care overhaul at bay</em> &#8211; <span class="blsp-spelling-error">WSJ</span><br />
<span class="blsp-spelling-error">WSJ</span> reports so-called Blue Dog Democrats continued to resist key aspects of their party&#8217;s health-care overhaul Sunday, despite pressure from party leaders who fear they will endanger President Barack <span class="blsp-spelling-error">Obama&#8217;s</span> most ambitious legislative effort. A leader of the fiscally conservative group of representatives said he expects any vote on the House&#8217;s health proposal would have to wait, likely until after Labor Day. &#8220;I think the American people want to take a closer look at this legislation. They want to feel more comfortable with it,&#8221; Rep. Jim Cooper, a Blue Dog from Tennessee, said on <span class="blsp-spelling-error">CBS&#8217;s</span> &#8220;Face the Nation.&#8221; House Speaker Nancy <span class="blsp-spelling-error">Pelosi</span> disputed any suggestion that the Blue Dogs&#8217; protests threatened the bill&#8217;s passage. &#8220;Absolutely, positively not,&#8221; she said Sunday on <span class="blsp-spelling-error">CNN&#8217;s</span> &#8220;State of the Union.&#8221; &#8220;When I take this bill to the floor, it will win&#8230;We will move forward. This will happen.&#8221; </span></span></span></div>
<div></div>
<div><span style="large;"><strong></strong></span></div>
<div><span style="large;"><strong><span style="130%;"><br />
Periodically I will post the <span class="blsp-spelling-error">EPS</span> news of companies we find interesting. This is not a recommendation to purchase or sell the shares. I will not engage in the hackneyed approach of other <span class="blsp-spelling-error">bloggers</span> and give advice about when to buy or sell. The purpose of these posts is to give you, the reader, an idea of what companies our research department deems worthy of review.</span></strong></span></div>
<p style="center;"><span style="130%;"><span style="large;"><strong>Earnings of Interest</strong></span></span></p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p></span></p>
<div><span style="large;"><strong><span style="#000099;"><span style="130%;">Of course, if you are an investor in any of the </span><a href="http://www.rosenthalcapital.com/"><span style="times new roman;"><span style="130%;"><span style="#225799;"><em>Fortune&#8217;s Favor Family of Funds</em> </span></span></span></a><span style="130%;">or a client of <em><span class="blsp-spelling-error">RCM</span></em> our door is always open. Feel free to call or email questions at any time.</span></span></strong></span></div>
<div><span style="large;"><strong><a href="https://www.briefing.com/GeneralContent/Platinum/Active/TickerSearch/TickerSearch.aspx?PagePrefix=IN&amp;Ticker=SOHU"><span class="blsp-spelling-error"><span style="130%;"><span style="large;">SOHU</span></span></span></a></strong></span></div>
<div><span style="large;"><strong> </strong></span></div>
<div><span style="large;"><strong> </strong></span></div>
<p><span style="large;"><strong> </p>
<p></strong></p>
<div><span style="large;"><span style="130%;"><em><span class="blsp-spelling-error">Sohu</span>.com beats by $0.03, beats on revs; guides Q3 revs above consensus</em> (63.63 )<br />
Reports Q2 (Jun) earnings of $0.79 per share&#8230;, $0.03 better than the First Call consensus of $0.76; revenues rose 24.6% year/year to $127.1 <span class="blsp-spelling-error">mln</span> vs the $123 <span class="blsp-spelling-error">mln</span> consensus. Gross margin was 77 in 2Q09, compared to 76% in 1Q09, and 76% in 2Q08. Non-<span class="blsp-spelling-error">GAAP</span> operating profit margin was 43% for 2Q09, compared to 45% in the previous quarter and 41% in 2Q08. </span></span></div>
<div><span style="large;"><span style="130%;">Co issues guidance for Q3, sees <span class="blsp-spelling-error">EPS</span> of $0.92-0.97; sees Q3 revs of $133.5-137.5 <span class="blsp-spelling-error">mln</span> vs. $132.18 <span class="blsp-spelling-error">mln</span> consensus. Assuming no new grants of share-based awards, <span class="blsp-spelling-error">Sohu</span> estimates share-based compensation expense for 3Q09 to be $4.0-5.0 <span class="blsp-spelling-error">mln</span>, which includes <span class="blsp-spelling-error">Changyou&#8217;s</span> share-based compensation expense for 3Q09 estimated to be $3.5-4.0 <span class="blsp-spelling-error">mln</span>. Considering <span class="blsp-spelling-error">Sohu&#8217;s</span> share in <span class="blsp-spelling-error">Changyou</span>, the estimated impact of this expense is expected to reduce <span class="blsp-spelling-error">Sohu&#8217;s</span> fully diluted <span class="blsp-spelling-error">EPS</span> for 3Q09 under US <span class="blsp-spelling-error">GAAP</span> by $0.07-0.09.</span></span></div>
<div><span style="large;"><a href="https://www.briefing.com/GeneralContent/Platinum/Active/TickerSearch/TickerSearch.aspx?PagePrefix=IN&amp;Ticker=CYOU"><span class="blsp-spelling-error"><span style="130%;"><span style="large;">CYOU</span></span></span></a></span></div>
<div></div>
<p></span><span style="large;"></p>
<div><span style="large;"><span style="130%;"><em><strong><span class="blsp-spelling-error">Changyou</span>.com beats by $0.04, beats on revs; guides Q3 revs in-line</strong></em> (41.65 )<br />
Reports Q2 (Jun) earnings of $0.66 per share, $0.04 better than the First Call consensus of $0.62; revenues rose 39.0% year/year to $66.6 <span class="blsp-spelling-error">mln</span> vs the $65 <span class="blsp-spelling-error">mln</span> consensus. Revenues from game operations for 2Q09 increased 9% quarter-over-quarter and 42% year-over-year to $64.9 <span class="blsp-spelling-error">mln</span>. The increases were mainly due to user base expansion and higher <span class="blsp-spelling-error">APA</span>, which reflect the growing popularity of the <span class="blsp-spelling-error">co&#8217;s</span> online games. </span></span></div>
<div><span style="large;"><span style="130%;">Co issues guidance for Q3, sees <span class="blsp-spelling-error">EPS</span> of $0.75-0.77; sees Q3 revs of $67.0-69.0 <span class="blsp-spelling-error">mln</span> vs. $68.92 <span class="blsp-spelling-error">mln</span> consensus. Assuming no new grants of share-based awards, <span class="blsp-spelling-error">Changyou</span> estimates share-based compensation expense for 3Q09 to be between $3.5-4.0 <span class="blsp-spelling-error">mln</span>, reducing fully diluted earnings per ADS by $0.07-0.08. </span></span></div>
<div><span style="large;"><a href="https://www.briefing.com/GeneralContent/Platinum/Active/TickerSearch/TickerSearch.aspx?PagePrefix=IN&amp;Ticker=GLW"><span class="blsp-spelling-error"><span style="130%;"><span style="large;">GLW</span></span></span></a><span style="130%;"><span style="large;"> </span></span></span></div>
<div></div>
<p></span><span style="large;"></p>
<div><span style="large;"><span style="times new roman;"><span style="130%;"><em><strong>Corning beats by $0.07, beats on revs; sees third-quarter glass shipments flat to up slightly (17.00 )<br />
</strong></em>Reports Q2 (Jun) earnings of $0.39 per share, $0.07 better than the First Call consensus of $0.32; revenues fell 17.6% year/year to $1.4 <span class="blsp-spelling-error">bln</span> vs the $1.36 <span class="blsp-spelling-error">bln</span> consensus. Gross margin was 41%, an increase over first-quarter gross margin of 27%. Display Technologies combined glass volume, including Corning&#8217;s wholly owned business and <span class="blsp-spelling-error">Samsung</span> Corning Precision Glass Co., Ltd. (<span class="blsp-spelling-error">SCP</span>),<em><strong> increased 66% sequentially</strong></em>. Volume in the <span class="blsp-spelling-error">co&#8217;s</span> wholly owned business <em><strong>improved by 101% sequentially</strong></em>, while <span class="blsp-spelling-error">SCP&#8217;s</span> volume increased by 50%. </span></span></span></div>
<div><span style="large;"><span style="130%;">Co says, &#8220;The resurgent demand for LCD glass is propelling us to restore much of our previously idled production capacity as quickly as possible to meet our customers&#8217; needs. Approximately 40% of our second-quarter shipments came from existing inventory. We need to- and have- restarted tanks to replace this inventory <span class="blsp-spelling-error">drawdown</span> to meet third-quarter demand. We believe our third-quarter glass shipments will be flat to up slightly, compared to the very strong second-quarter level. year. We estimate that current inventory supplies are 16% less than the second quarter last year, compared to retail demand that has been running approximately 15% ahead of a year ago. Retail demand is <span class="blsp-spelling-error">forecasted</span> to continue growing at double-digit rates in the back half of this year. This comparison gives us some comfort about the outlook for the remainder of the year. However, the pace of economic recovery remains uncertain and we are being cautious about the amount of capacity we are restarting for the fourth quarter and for early 2010. As we receive more clarity from our customers on their fourth-quarter outlook, we will make decisions on our fourth-quarter capacity levels. We have increased our forecast for LCD glass market volume in 2009 due to the vitality of LCD TV sales in the first half of the year. We now estimate that total yearly volume will be around 2.3 <span class="blsp-spelling-error">bln</span> square feet, or about 15% growth over last year. Corning originally expected annual glass volume to be 2 <span class="blsp-spelling-error">bln</span> square feet and early last quarter revised it upward to a range of 2.1-2.2 <span class="blsp-spelling-error">bln</span> square feet.</span></span></div>
<div><span style="large;"> </span></div>
<div><span style="large;"> </span></div>
<div><span style="large;"> </span></div>
<p></span><span style="large;"> </p>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hedgeco.net/blogs/2009/07/27/fasb-rule-changes-all-hail-the-blue-dogs-sohucyouglw-earnings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

