Stock Market Investing:
Development One: Economic numbers that suggest recovery begin to outpace negative economic news. This leads to the perception — or possibly, the reality — that the Fed will reverse its stance on easy credit.
If you are a new reader I strongly advise the perusal of past post before you begin your protest. Those of you who are familiar with my work will know the well documented relationship between bad economic numbers, easy credit, weak US$ and strong equity markets. As long as the Fed remains committed to easy credit in all its forms the bull market can continue.
However, I have witnessed a disturbing trend over the last few weeks. Good news on the economy leads to selling. This suggests to me a real fear pervades the markets with regard to the continuation of easy credit. The equity markets are trading at these lofty levels because of liquidity not reality and if the Fed controlled gravy train of easy credit stops then trouble will ensue. When the gravy stops dog will eat dog. What the distribution of the last few weeks may be telling us is that the big dogs are smelling trouble and are preparing.
Today’s trading offers a perfect illustration of Development One. First, good earnings numbers out of Microsoft & Amazon were not able to move the markets higher. Instead the excitement was used by the big players to distribute their holding. Second, the following “good” economic report hit the news wires this morning, but the equity markets sold off almost immediately after the release:
Existing Home Sales Exceed Expectations
Existing home sales jumped 9.2% to 5.57 million units in September. The increase followed an unexpected decline (-2.9%) of sales in August. The consensus was expecting sales to rise by a much more modest 5.1% to 5.35 million units.
We obviously don’t have the answer to these questions. However, this very real possibility must be respected. There has always been a high correlation between long rates and the equity markets. I can think of no better example than the crash of 1987. For four months the bond market was collapsing (rates rising) before the equity markets infamously followed.
Of course, in ’87 bonds sold off because the Fed was tightening. If, however, bonds sell off even in the face of Fed easy credit policies then I hate to see the ensuing equity market response.
Record Auctions Announced…euro 1.5001…yen 91.5060 (3.411% -07/32)
Treasury will sell a record batch of bonds next week with $44B 2-yrs Tuesday, $41B 5-yrs Wednesday and $31B 7-yrs Thursday. The record levels show an increase of $1B on the 2-and-5s, and $2B on the 7-yrs. There will also be $7B reopened 5-yr TIPS going off Monday along with $29B 3-mos and $30B 6-mos. The market may get some relief as the news is over, but the high end of expectations had been for closer to $115B versus the $116B announced, so any relief may be brief.
Development Three: The high profile SEC take down of Galleon may cause a ripple effect leading to hedge fund unwinds.
Galleon had over $3 billion and now according to DJ-Galleon winding down all hedge funds.
Last year we all witnessed what happens when hedge funds are forced to unwind. Many of the big funds are often involved in the same trades and one unwind leads to another. There will be many denials along the way but the equity markets will speak the truth.
I will also respectfully submit to you, the readers, that the derivatives crisis is far from over. The individuals that created the credit crisis are still running the show. If you believe this statement is incorrect or feel President Obama promised you change so his cabinet must be full of new thinkers, I suggest you view the PBS Frontline documentary entitled The Warning .
The Warning brings to mind two obvious questions:
1- What will cause the next derivatives crisis? Could it be the take down of a major hedge fund that ignites the next collapse?
2- Why isn’t Brooksley Born a major member of the Obama administration? If he was truly an agent for change wouldn’t she be a must in the cabinet?
Development Two: A funding crisis unfolds.
Will the US$ decline in value to a point where long rates must increase aggressively for our government to continue funding its debt? How long will China and others tolerate the ruse of quantitative easing before demanding higher rates?